Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 990

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cautionary Note about R2

Kvålseth, Tarald O.·1985·The American Statistician

Abstract

The coefficient of determination (R 2) is perhaps the single most extensively used measure of goodness of fit for regression models. It is also widely misused. The primary source of the problem is that except for linear models with an intercept term, the several alternative R 2 statistics are not generally equivalent. This article discusses various considerations and potential pitfalls in using the R 2's. Specific points are exemplified by means of empirical data. A new resistant statistic is also introduced.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00031305.1985.10479448

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 990

Metadata

Authors
Kvålseth, T. O.
Venue
The American Statistician
Published
1985-11
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
279-285
ISSN
  • 0003-1305 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2731
OpenAlex
W2057327562
Cited by
990
References
13
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cautionary Note about R2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00031305.1985.10479448
The paper
Kvålseth, T. O. (1985). Cautionary Note about R2. The American Statistician. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1985.10479448

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.