CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 76Sports Analytics and PerformanceSports Performance and TrainingSports, Gender, and Society

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Home-Court Advantage: How Large is it, and Does it Vary from Team to Team?

Harville, David A., Smith, Michael H.·1994·The American Statistician
DOI 10.1080/00031305.1994.10476013
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

College basketball fans often speculate on the extent and nature of the home-court advantage. In this article, it is shown how questions about the size of the home-court advantage and about team-to-team differences in the home-court advantage can be addressed by fitting three different linear models to the outcomes of college basketball games. This approach was applied to data from the 1991–1992 college basketball season. The advantage of playing at home (in relation to playing on a neutral court) was estimated to be 4.68 ± 0.28 points. The effect of team-to-team differences in the home-court advantage was found to be relatively small.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00031305.1994.10476013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 10.1080/01621459.1977.10480991 · DOI
  2. Harville, D. A. “Football Ratings and Predictions via Linear Models”. Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, American Statistical Association. pp.74–82.
  3. 1991, Official 1992 NCAA Basketball
  4. Sallas W. M., 1988, Bayesian Analysis of Times Series and Dynamic Models, 477
  5. Searle S. R., 1971, Linear Models
  6. Stefani R. T., 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 7, 117, 10.1109/TSMC.1977.4309667 · DOI
  7. Stefani R. T., 1980, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 10, 116, 10.1109/TSMC.1980.4308442 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Harville, D. A., & Smith, M. H.
Affiliations
Iowa State University (US)
ORCID
Smith, Michael H.
Venue
The American Statistician
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1994-02
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
22-28
ISSN
  • 0003-1305 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2731
DOI
10.1080/00031305.1994.10476013
OpenAlex
W2022639594
Cited by
76
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The American Statistician (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Sports Analytics and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
Keywords
home court advantage, college basketball, sports statistics, linear models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review