Cited by 9Indian and Buddhist StudiesChinese history and philosophyEurasian Exchange Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Repository of Ingenuity: Cave 61 and Artistic Appropriation in Tenth-Century Dunhuang

Lee, Sonya S.·2012·The Art Bulletin

Abstract

In 947 Cao Yuanzhong, military commissioner of the Hexi region and the de facto ruler of Dunhuang, began the construction of Cave 61 at Mogao in northwestern China. The structure's architecture, location, and pictorial program bear a remarkable degree of similarity to the caves of his predecessors. The apparent repetition of the earlier designs has led past scholars to dismiss Cave 61 and the art of the time as formulaic and sterile. A closer look at Cave 61 reveals that this project was in fact motivated by a new understanding and practice of artistic appropriation in tenth-century Dunhuang.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00043079.2012.10786038

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lee, S. S.
Corresponding author
Lee, Sonya S.
Venue
The Art Bulletin
Published
2012-06
Volume
94
Issue
2
Pages
199-225
ISSN
  • 0004-3079 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-6478
OpenAlex
W1973045960
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Art Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Eurasian Exchange Networks
Keywords
Mogao Caves, Dunhuang, appropriation art, Hexi region

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review