Cited by 63Stalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentWorkplace Violence and BullyingBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Harm Associated With Stalking Victimization

Thomas, Stuart D. M., Purcell, Rosemary, Pathé, Michele, Mullen, Paul E.·2008·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the present study was to determine the frequency at which assault and attempted assault occur as outcomes among stalking victims, and to explore the common characteristics of those cases in which the victims report these harmful outcomes as a result of the stalking behaviour. Method: A sample of 3700 men and women randomly selected from the electoral roll were sent a postal questionnaire to determine the prevalence and nature of their experiences of stalking behaviours. Those who self-reported that they had been stalked were divided according to whether their pursuer had, or had not, attacked them. Results: Of the 432 who reported having been stalked, 75 (17.4%) had been attacked. A number of victim and perpetrator factors differentiated those who reported attacks. A combination of the victim being threatened, being an ex-intimate, and being younger at the time of the stalking incident were predictive of attack. A multivariate model containing these factors correctly classified 82% of the sample and achieved an AUC of 0.87. Conclusions: Stalking is an all too common problem behaviour that can result in a range of harmful outcomes for victims. Threats made by ex-intimates are a particular cause for concern. The generalizability of these findings should be tested using robust prospective methodologies in diverse populations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00048670802277230

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1017/CBO9781139106863 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/oso/9780195189841.001.0001 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/oso/9780195189841.003.0007 · DOI
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1996, Women's safety, Australia
  5. Budd T, 2000, Stalking: findings from the 1998 British Crime Survey
  6. 10.1192/bjp.187.2.168 · DOI
  7. 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.00985.x · DOI
  8. Tjaden P, 1998, Stalking in America: findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey
  9. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2005.00030.x · DOI
  10. 10.1177/0093854803259241 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/B978-012490560-3/50020-7 · DOI
  12. 10.3928/0048-5713-20031001-09 · DOI
  13. Swartz-Watts DM, 2003, J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, 31, 440
  14. James DV, 2003, J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, 31, 432
  15. 10.1002/bsl.477 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/9780470713037.ch2 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/14789940412331313368 · DOI
  18. 10.1037/0022-006X.62.4.783 · DOI
  19. Agresti A, 1996, An introduction to categorical data analysis
  20. 10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1176/ajp.156.8.1244 · DOI
  22. 10.1017/S003329170700181X · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.03.005 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Mullen PE, 2009, Stalkers and their victims2nd edn, 226
  25. 10.1177/009385402237998 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.10.001 · DOI
  27. 10.1037/1076-8971.4.1-2.236 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Thomas, S. D. M., Purcell, R., Pathé, M., & Mullen, P. E.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Mullen, Paul E.
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2008-01-01
Volume
42
Issue
9
Pages
800-806
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W2032163881
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
11.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
stalking, stalking victims, assault, threats, victim characteristics, offender characteristics, stalking prevalence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aggression, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Risk Factors, Social Behavior, Victoria, Multivariate Analysis, Crime Victims, Mentally Ill Persons, Persons with Psychiatric Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review