The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Harm Associated With Stalking Victimization
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of the present study was to determine the frequency at which assault and attempted assault occur as outcomes among stalking victims, and to explore the common characteristics of those cases in which the victims report these harmful outcomes as a result of the stalking behaviour. Method: A sample of 3700 men and women randomly selected from the electoral roll were sent a postal questionnaire to determine the prevalence and nature of their experiences of stalking behaviours. Those who self-reported that they had been stalked were divided according to whether their pursuer had, or had not, attacked them. Results: Of the 432 who reported having been stalked, 75 (17.4%) had been attacked. A number of victim and perpetrator factors differentiated those who reported attacks. A combination of the victim being threatened, being an ex-intimate, and being younger at the time of the stalking incident were predictive of attack. A multivariate model containing these factors correctly classified 82% of the sample and achieved an AUC of 0.87. Conclusions: Stalking is an all too common problem behaviour that can result in a range of harmful outcomes for victims. Threats made by ex-intimates are a particular cause for concern. The generalizability of these findings should be tested using robust prospective methodologies in diverse populations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The risk of stalking violence increases with greater closeness between the stalker and their victim.
“Approximately one third of all stalking situations involve violence and the risk of violence increases with greater closeness between the stalker and their victim (Churcher & Nesca, 2013; McEwan et al., 2007; Thomas et al., 2008).”
From Police-Identified Psychological Distress, Substance Use, and Physical Violence Among Male Intimate Partner Stalkers (2025) · cites this paper as Thomas et al., 2008
Approximately one third of all stalking situations involve violence.
“Approximately one third of all stalking situations involve violence and the risk of violence increases with greater closeness between the stalker and their victim (Churcher & Nesca, 2013; McEwan et al., 2007; Thomas et al., 2008).”
From Police-Identified Psychological Distress, Substance Use, and Physical Violence Among Male Intimate Partner Stalkers (2025) · cites this paper as Thomas et al., 2008
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- 10.1017/CBO9781139106863 · DOI
- 10.1093/oso/9780195189841.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1093/oso/9780195189841.003.0007 · DOI
- Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1996, Women's safety, Australia
- Budd T, 2000, Stalking: findings from the 1998 British Crime Survey
- 10.1192/bjp.187.2.168 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.00985.x · DOI
- Tjaden P, 1998, Stalking in America: findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey
- 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2005.00030.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0093854803259241 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/B978-012490560-3/50020-7 · DOI
- 10.3928/0048-5713-20031001-09 · DOI
- Swartz-Watts DM, 2003, J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, 31, 440
- James DV, 2003, J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, 31, 432
- 10.1002/bsl.477 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470713037.ch2 · DOI
- 10.1080/14789940412331313368 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-006X.62.4.783 · DOI
- Agresti A, 1996, An introduction to categorical data analysis
- 10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1176/ajp.156.8.1244 · DOI
- 10.1017/S003329170700181X · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.03.005 · DOI · Paper page
- Mullen PE, 2009, Stalkers and their victims2nd edn, 226
- 10.1177/009385402237998 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.10.001 · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-8971.4.1-2.236 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Landwehr, E., Roberts, L., Garratt-Reed, D., & Maxwell-Smith, C. (2025) · International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology · doi:10.1177/0306624x241228977 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, S. D. M., Purcell, R., Pathé, M., & Mullen, P. E.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Mullen, Paul E.
- Venue
- Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-01-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 800-806
- ISSN
- 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1614
- OpenAlex
- W2032163881
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 11.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Violence and Bullying
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Keywords
- stalking, stalking victims, assault, threats, victim characteristics, offender characteristics, stalking prevalence
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aggression, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Risk Factors, Social Behavior, Victoria, Multivariate Analysis, Crime Victims, Mentally Ill Persons, Persons with Psychiatric Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review