Maximising the benefits of trees on farms in Tasmania – a desktop review of investment opportunities to improve farm enterprise productivity, profitability and sustainability.
Open accessAbstract
Demand for forest products in Australia exceeds domestic capacity for local production and supply, resulting in a significant trade deficit in forest products of around AUD 2 billion per year. Domestic demand for forest products is forecast to continue increasing because such products are recognised as more sustainable than many alternative materials used in construction and as feedstocks for other industrial processes. There is increasing pressure to establish more forest plantations to meet this need. Tasmania has around 16% of the national plantation estate and large areas of natural forests that have been protected and conserved. However, there has been a recent decline in the area of the plantation estate, both nationally and in Tasmania, mainly due to increasing competition from agricultural land uses, which provide higher returns and drive land prices higher than can be justified by returns from forestry. This declining trend will be hard to reverse, given that substantial new areas are unlikely to be available for greenfield plantation establishment. A more prospective area for expansion is likely to be the establishment of trees on farms. This option has significant potential because strategic investment in trees on farms can create valuable assets for increasing farm-level sustainability, resilience and profitability. The choice of appropriate species and planting configuration can help improve the financial balance sheet, stocks of natural capital and flows of ecosystem services. Past investment motives for tree-planting in Australia have mainly been based on anticipated returns from timber. If more tree-planting is to be achieved in Tasmania in the future, it will have to be on cleared private land, and the investment motivation will need to encompass the broader values of trees beyond wood production. This review explores the prospective investment opportunities to facilitate greater establishment of trees on farms and sets out seven key areas where research and policy effort is needed: engaging with leading agricultural financial institutions; engaging with institutional investors; engaging with grower organisations around ‘zero carbon’ and ‘nature positive’ branding; research to support the better quantification and adoption of natural capital and its financial benefits; encouraging joint ventures between the industrial plantation sector and farmers; better monetising the carbon sequestration by trees; and the reinvigoration of social capital around growing trees.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Although sequestration rates decline to low levels once the site is fully stocked and trees reach maturity, trees do continue to provide critical ecosystem services, including biodiversity, salinity management and animal welfare benefits through shade and shelter.
“Notably, although sequestration rates decline to low levels once the site is fully stocked and trees reach maturity (Department of the Prime Minister, and Cabinet 2021), trees do continue to provide critical ecosystem services, including biodiversity, salinity management and animal welfare benefits through shade and shelter (Monckton and Mendham 2022).”
From Can soil and tree carbon sequestration maintain zero net emissions grazing? (2025) · cites this paper as Monckton and Mendham 2022
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Can soil and tree carbon sequestration maintain zero net emissions grazing?
Macdonald, A., Court, J., Meyer, R., Wootton, M., Kantor, E., Keenan, R., Stewart, H., & Eckard, R. (2025) · Animal Production Science · doi:10.1071/an24346 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Monckton, D., & Mendham, D. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Mendham, D. S.
- ORCID
- Mendham, D. S.
- Venue
- Australian Forestry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-01-02
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6-12
- ISSN
- 0004-9158 (ISSN-L)
- 2325-6087
- OpenAlex
- W4210932473
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Australian Forestry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Landcare Programme
- Private Forests Tasmania
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
- Keywords
- trees on farms, agroforestry, forest plantations, farm profitability, farm sustainability, natural capital, ecosystem services, carbon sequestration, institutional investors, zero carbon, joint ventures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review