Cited by 11Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsStudent Stress and Coping

Desensitization without hierarchical presentation and concomitant relaxation

Dawson, R. W., McMurray, N. E.·1978·Australian Journal of Psychology

Abstract

The consequences of eliminating both the procedures of training in deep muscle relaxation and hierarchical presentation of aversive imagery counterposed with muscle relaxation, were investigated in the experimental group desensitization of examination anxiety experienced by tertiary level students. It was found that the experimental condition of random presentation of aversive imaginal stimuli counterposed with a passage of time during which no specific activities were scheduled, resulted in a significant reduction of examination anxiety equal to that achieved by a standardized systematic desensitization (SD) procedure. Furthermore, this reduction of anxiety achieved by the experimental condition was maintained at an average four-week follow-up conducted at the completion of examinations. The extent to which these findings contradict current rationales of process underlying the efficacy of SD was discussed. An alternative rationale which accommodates the diversity of findings in the literature relating to SD and which also applies to other desensitization techniques, such as flooding and implosion, was proposed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00049537808256366

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Earlier comparisons of graduated imaginal exposure with and without PMR usually found no difference.

    “earlier studies (albeit none specifically examining PD/A samples) that compared graduated imaginal exposure with versus without the addition of PMR generally found no differences between the two conditions (e.g., Dawson & McMurray, 1978; Waters, McDonald, & Koresko, 1972; Yates, 1975; see Kazdin & Wilcoxon, 1976; McGlynn, Solomon, & Barrios, 1979, for reviews).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 54 · Cited by 11

Authors
Dawson, R. W., & McMurray, N. E.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Australian Journal of Psychology
Published
1978-08-01
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
119-132
ISSN
  • 0004-9530 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-9536
OpenAlex
W2018787137
Cited by
11
References
54
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Australian Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
systematic desensitization, test anxiety, relaxation training, anxiety maintenance, tertiary students, floods, implosion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review