Cited by 8Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEvaluation of Teaching PracticesOnline and Blended Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. By Diana Laurillard: Pp 272. London: Routledge. 2012. £22.99 (pbk). ISBN-10: 041580387X.

Morris, Neil·2012·British Journal of Educational Studies

Abstract

In this book, Diana Laurillard has brought together a wealth of pedagogical and educational research data and aligned it with real examples of how teachers design effective learning for students us...

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00071005.2012.742279

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 8

Metadata

Authors
Morris, N.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Morris, Neil
Venue
British Journal of Educational Studies
Published
2012-12
Volume
60
Issue
4
Pages
448-450
ISSN
  • 0007-1005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8527
OpenAlex
W1496269277
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
British Journal of Educational Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
design science, pedagogical patterns, learning design, instructional design, educational technology, teacher practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review