Cited by 6Forensic Entomology and Diptera StudiesForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesWildlife Ecology and Conservation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The use of Radio Transmitters to Track Specific Bones of Scavenged Pig Carcasses

Adair, T.W., Kolz, A.L.·1998·Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal

Abstract

This is the first report on a pilot study using radio transmitter to track skeletal remains of scavenged pig carcasses. Three adult pigs were placed on property con- trolled by the Highlands Ranch Law Enforcement Training Facility in Douglas County, Colorado, from June to October 1994. Approximately eleven acres of this facility is designated for research conducted by NecroSearch International, a group of forensic scientists who conduct research with pig carcasses for the purpose of developing methods for locating clandestine graves. To simulate actual crime scenes, two pigs were placed in shallow graves while the third was left partially exposed in a drainage ditch. The three carcasses were instrumented with at least one radio transmitter. Following the burials, the radio transmitters allowed the researchers to monitor the movement of the instrumented bones to distances that, in one case, exceeded 400 meters from the burial site. Results from this study indicate that radio telemetry is an unexploited research tool that can effectively monitor the movement of certain skeletal remains during the process of scavenging.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00085030.1998.10757114

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Binford L.R.Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths, Academic Press, New York: 1981; 51–77.
  2. Haglund W.D., 1988, Journal of Forensic Sciences July, 33, 985, 10.1520/JFS12521J · DOI
  3. Haglund W.D., 1989, Journal of Forensic Sciences May, 34, 587, 10.1520/JFS12679J · DOI
  4. Haglund W.D., 1990, The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology;, 11, 35, 10.1097/00000433-199003000-00004 · DOI
  5. France D.L., 1992, Journal of Forensic Sciences; November, 37, 1445, 10.1520/JFS13337J · DOI
  6. Haglund W.D., 1997, Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains.
  7. Amlaner C.J., 1980, A Handbook on Biotelemetry and Radio Tracking.
  8. Cochran W.W., 1980, Wildlife Management Techniques., 507
  9. Russell T., 1995, Tracking Vehicles

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Adair, T. W., & Kolz, A. L.
Affiliations
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (US)
Venue
Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal
Published
1998-01
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
127-133
ISSN
  • 0008-5030 (ISSN-L)
  • 2332-1660
OpenAlex
W1980341016
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
radio telemetry, skeletal remains, pig carcasses, clandestine graves, grave location, forensic odontology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review