Cited by 26Forensic Entomology and Diptera StudiesForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesAutopsy Techniques and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Identifying Bird Scavenging in Fleshed and Dry Remains

Komar, D., Beattie, O.·1998·Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal

Abstract

Differentiating postmortem artifacts produced by natural taphonomic processes from perimortem trauma is crucial in accurate crime scene interpretation, particularly in cases involving the advanced decomposition of remains. Carrion experiments reveal that repeated, extensive scavenging by common birds such as magpies and crows can alter or obliterate evidence of perimortem trauma as well as create postmortem artifacts similar in appearance to penetrating trauma. The location, extent and pattern of damage, as well as characteristic wound morphology in soft tissue and bone, aid in the accurate identification of bird scavenging. Differentiating bird modification to bone from that of rodent and carnivore is illustrated, and the role of birds as agents of transport is compared with that of other scavengers. A case study is presented in which bird, canid and rodent created artifacts on bone are evident.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00085030.1998.10757117

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Haglund W.D., 1992, J. Forensic Sci., 37, 1459, 10.1520/JFS13338J · DOI
  2. Mann R.W., 1990, J. Forensic Sci., 35, 103, 10.1520/JFS12806J · DOI · Paper page
  3. Haglund W.D., 1989, J. Forensic Sci., 34, 587, 10.1520/JFS12679J · DOI
  4. Blumenschine R.J., 1986, J. Human Evo., 15, 639, 10.1016/S0047-2484(86)80002-1 · DOI
  5. Rossi M.L., 1994, Am. J. Forensic Med. Path, 15, 105, 10.1097/00000433-199406000-00004 · DOI
  6. Wiley P., 1989, J. Forensic Sci., 34, 894, 10.1520/JFS12718J · DOI · Paper page
  7. Haglund W.D., 1988, J. Forensic Sci., 33, 985, 10.1520/JFS12521J · DOI
  8. Milner G.R., 1989, Am. J. Phys. Anthro., 79, 43, 10.1002/ajpa.1330790105 · DOI
  9. Hill A., 1979, Paleobiology, 5, 261, 10.1017/S0094837300006552 · DOI
  10. Haglund W.D., 1997, Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains.
  11. Bass W.M., 1997, Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains.
  12. Rodriguez W.C., 1997, Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains.
  13. France D.L., 1997, Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains.
  14. Bovey R., 1990, Birds of Edmonton
  15. Salt W.R., 1976, The Birds of Alberta with their Ranges in Saskatchewan and Manitoba.
  16. Godfrey W.E., 1986, The Birds of Canada
  17. Roll P., 1991, Forensic Sci. Int., 52, 25, 10.1016/0379-0738(91)90093-X · DOI
  18. Angel J.L., 1964, Clin Orthopaedics, 32, 130
  19. Finnegan M., 1978, J. Anat., 125, 23
  20. Haglund W.D., 1993, J. Forensic Sci., 38, 69, 10.1520/JFS13377J · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Komar, D., & Beattie, O.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Venue
Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal
Published
1998-01
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
177-188
ISSN
  • 0008-5030 (ISSN-L)
  • 2332-1660
OpenAlex
W2331222318
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
Keywords
postmortem artifacts, perimortem trauma, taphonomy, magpies, crows, wound morphology, bone modification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review