The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of taphonomic progression due to the necrophagic activity of geographically disparate scavenging guilds
Abstract
Taphonomy, the study of the progression of living things from death to decay or fossilization, is crucial for understanding and determining the post mortem interval. One of the many factors that influence the taphonomic development of a set of remains is scavenger activity. Animals that feed on a carcass can greatly influence the interpretation of the circumstances which have led to the deposition of the body, thus it is important to be able to characterise how necrophagy impacts decomposition. Because the species of scavengers vary greatly depending on the region, information must be gathered in different areas that can provide generalizations for diverse geographic locations. This study seeks to characterise and compare the decomposition rates of remains in Western Australia and in Ontario, Canada. Domestic pig (Sus scrofa) carcasses were placed in four locations near Perth, Western Australia and in two locations in Ontario, Canada. These were observed using trail cameras to document scavenging activity and the progression of decay. The results showed that even when climatic variable are taken into account, the effects of scavenging on decompositional rates are significant. Information from this research provides insight into the influence of distinct scavenging guilds on decomposition and how understanding the necrophagy of local fauna may contribute to the interpretation of a death scene.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One additional publication describes two similar experiments, one in Canada and Australia, each (1.3%, n = 1) [73].”
From Forensic experiments on animal scavenging: A systematic literature review on what we have and what we need (2023) · cites this paper as [73]
In the citing paper
“5.1% (4/79) did not specify their total sample size [72,73,98,99].”
From Forensic experiments on animal scavenging: A systematic literature review on what we have and what we need (2023) · cites this paper as [73]
In the citing paper
“some animals might avoid places in close proximity to settlements [73]”
From Forensic experiments on animal scavenging: A systematic literature review on what we have and what we need (2023) · cites this paper as [73]
In the citing paper
“the human activity before the experiment or nearby can in fluence animal presence, diversity and behaviour [73,127 -129].”
From Forensic experiments on animal scavenging: A systematic literature review on what we have and what we need (2023) · cites this paper as [73]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- 10.1520/JFS12718J · DOI · Paper page
- Bass WM, 1997, Forensic taphonomy: the Postmortem fate of human remains, 181
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.01.006 · DOI · Paper page
- Young A, 2015, J Forensic Sci., 60, S38
- 10.1007/s12024-007-0016-3 · DOI
- 10.1097/00000433-199909000-00006 · DOI
- Haglund WD, 1997, Forensic taphonomy: the Postmortem fate of human remains, 367
- 10.1007/s004140050212 · DOI
- 10.1111/1556-4029.12597 · DOI
- DiMaio VJ, 2001, Forensic Pathology
- Haskell NH, 1997, Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains, 415
- 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1998.tb00038.x · DOI
- O'Brien RC, 2008, Doctoral thesis
- 10.1520/JFS2004017 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Indra, L., Lösch, S., Errickson, D., & Finaughty, D. (2023) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111862 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Brien, R. C., Appleton, A. J., & Forbes, S. L.
- Affiliations
- Department of Forensic Science, University of New Haven, West Haven, CT, USA
- University of New Haven (US)
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- ORCID
- Forbes, Shari L.
- Venue
- Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-12-14
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 42-53
- ISSN
- 0008-5030 (ISSN-L)
- 2332-1660
- OpenAlex
- W2565159863
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 0.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal (publishedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Diptera species taxonomy and behavior
- Keywords
- taphonomy, carcass decomposition, necrophagy, postmortem interval, decomposition rate, climate effects on decomposition, Western Australia, Ontario
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review