Knowing-In-Action: The New Scholarship Requires a New Epistemology
Abstract
(1995). Knowing-In-Action: The New Scholarship Requires a New Epistemology. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning: Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 27-34.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement
Zhao, C.-M., & Kuh, G. D. (2004) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1023/b:rihe.0000015692.88534.de · Cited by 1,198 · see citing works
Reframing Professional Development Through Understanding Authentic Professional Learning
Webster-Wright, A. (2009) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308330970 · Cited by 1,174 · see citing works
Mind the Gap: Approaches to Addressing the Research-to-Practice, Practice-to-Research Chasm
Smith, L. S., & Wilkins, N. (2018) · Journal of Public Health Management and Practice · doi:10.1097/phh.0000000000000667 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Mechouat, K. (2024) · European Scientific Journal, ESJ · doi:10.19044/esj.2024.v20n28p135 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schön, D. A.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schön, Donald A.
- Venue
- Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 27-34
- ISSN
- 0009-1383 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9146
- OpenAlex
- W2093487900
- Cited by
- 861
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 37
- FWCI
- 42.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Change The Magazine of Higher Learning (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- knowing-in-action, epistemology, scholarships, action research, higher education, knowledge production
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review