Cited by 861Research, Science, and AcademiaEducational Theory and Curriculum StudiesEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

Knowing-In-Action: The New Scholarship Requires a New Epistemology

Schön, Donald A.·1995·Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning

Abstract

(1995). Knowing-In-Action: The New Scholarship Requires a New Epistemology. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning: Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 27-34.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00091383.1995.10544673

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Authors
Schön, D. A.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Schön, Donald A.
Venue
Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning
Published
1995-11
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
27-34
ISSN
  • 0009-1383 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9146
OpenAlex
W2093487900
Cited by
861
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 37
FWCI
42.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Change The Magazine of Higher Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
knowing-in-action, epistemology, scholarships, action research, higher education, knowledge production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review