Cited by 45Second Language Learning and TeachingMultilingual Education and PolicyEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Secondary Teachers and English Language Learners (ELLs): Attitudes, Preparation and Implications

Rubinstein-Avila, Eliane, Lee, En Hye·2014·The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas

Abstract

The education of language-minority students is a constitutional right. Throughout this article, the authors synthesize recent literature addressing two main questions: (1) What are secondary teachers’ attitudes toward English language learners (ELLs)? and (2) To what extent are secondary teachers being prepared to teach content effectively to this student population? Secondary teachers’ attitudes about ELLs vary, but are generally positive. The lack of teacher preparation—especially at the secondary level—to teach ELLs effectively is widespread. Thus, it is not surprising that secondary teachers feel ill-prepared to scaffold or differentiate instruction to meet these students’ language and academic needs. Since attitudes, preparation, and practice are interrelated, the authors also provide numerous implications for future practice at various levels: teacher-preparation programs, school district support, and classroom teaching.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00098655.2014.910162

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. August D., 2006, Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on language-minority children and youth
  2. Berg H., 2012, American Secondary Education, 40, 34
  3. 10.3200/TCHS.77.5.202-208 · DOI
  4. Gándara P., 2009, The Latino education crisis: The consequences of failed social policies, 10.4159/9780674056367 · DOI
  5. Lopes-Murphy S., 2012, The Clearing House, 85, 226, 10.1080/00098655.2012.693549 · DOI
  6. 10.3200/TCHS.80.1.29-32 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/00405841003641535 · DOI
  8. 10.3200/JOER.99.3.131-143 · DOI
  9. Rubinstein-Ávila, E. 2003. English Education 35 (2): 122–36. · DOI
  10. Rubinstein-Ávila, E. 2006. Educational Leadership 63 (5): 38–43.
  11. Rubinstein-Avila, E. 2013. Voices from the Middle (NCTE Journal) 20 (4): 28–33. · DOI
  12. Rubinstein-Avila E., 2014, Best practices for adolescent literacy instruction, 2nd ed
  13. Rubinstein-Avila E., Journal of Urban Education
  14. 10.1598/JAAL.53.1.4 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/13670050408667804 · DOI
  16. Walker A., 2004, Journal of Research and Practice, 2, 130
  17. 10.1598/RT.61.3.2 · DOI
  18. Yoon B., 2010, Teacher Education and Practice, 23, 31

Cited by

See all 45

Metadata

Authors
Rubinstein-Avila, E., & Lee, E. H.
Venue
The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas
Published
2014-07-24
Volume
87
Issue
5
Pages
187-191
ISSN
  • 0009-8655 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-912X
OpenAlex
W2044733403
Cited by
45
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7
FWCI
60.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Clearing House A Journal of Educational Strategies Issues and Ideas (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
English language learners, secondary school teachers, teacher attitudes, teacher preparation, CLIL, instructional scaffolding, differentiated instruction, language minority students, teacher education curriculum, school district support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Secondary Teachers and English Language Learners (ELLs): Attitudes, Preparation and Implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00098655.2014.910162
The paper
Rubinstein-Avila, E., & Lee, E. H. (2014). Secondary Teachers and English Language Learners (ELLs): Attitudes, Preparation and Implications. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2014.910162