Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 495

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Soil testing for heavy metals

McLaughlin, M. J., Zarcinas, B. A., Stevens, D. P., Cook, N.·2000·Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Abstract

Soil testing for metal contaminants is a continually evolving process aimed at improving the assessment of environmental and human health hazards associated with heavy metals in soils and plants. A number of challenges present themselves before accurate, reliable and precise contaminant hazard assessment criteria for soils and plants can be made. These include: sampling, extraction and analytical obstacles associated with the determination of trace levels of metals in environmental media; quality assurance and quality control issues associated with both extraction and analytical procedures (especially for metals where non‐compliance with regulatory standards may be penalised); and confounding environmental effects (e.g. rooting depth, soil salinity, Eh, pH, plant species, metal species) which limit the usefulness of the relationship between the current tests and actual hazards. These difficulties have combined to produce soil tests for heavy metals often poorly correlated with hazardwhether this be crop uptake of a contaminant (e.g. Cd), or the adverse effects of metals or metalloids on human or environmental health (e.g. As, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Se, Pb, Zn). Assessment of an “available” fraction of a particular soil nutrient is the accepted norm of soil testing for crop nutrition. In many countries, assessment of metal hazard is still inappropriately based on the total soil metal concentration, despite increasing recognition that the concept of elemental availability is just as relevant for environmental hazard as for crop nutrition. Tests that aim to assess metal “bioavailability” are now gaining widespread acceptance by regulators as a means to characterise hazards from contaminants in soil. While a significant advance on the use of total metal concentrations, the concept raises difficulties in providing an adequate assessment of potential risk, due to changes in environmental conditions which affect bioavailability, e.g. soil pH, soil organic matter content. This chapter summarises current soil testing methodologies for metal contaminants and examines new concepts and procedures for assessing hazards from metal contamination of soils.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00103620009370531

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 495

Metadata

Authors
McLaughlin, M. J., Zarcinas, B. A., Stevens, D. P., & Cook, N.
Venue
Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis
Published
2000-06
Volume
31
Issue
11-14
Pages
1661-1700
ISSN
  • 0010-3624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2416
OpenAlex
W1965280698
Cited by
495
References
1
FWCI
6.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil testing for heavy metals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00103620009370531
The paper
McLaughlin, M. J., Zarcinas, B. A., Stevens, D. P., & Cook, N. (2000). Soil testing for heavy metals. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620009370531

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.