Cited by 21Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesAdvanced Chemical Sensor TechnologiesIon Channels and Receptors

Olfaction: the physics of how smell works?

Brookes, Jennifer C.·2011·Contemporary Physics

Abstract

Smell is a physical process used by us all, but fully understood by none. A physicist seeks to understand the mysterious phenomena of nature and so it is natural to apply physics to this problem. There is a reluctance in the field of olfactory science to explore the physical processes of fundamental interactions in odorant recognition because the system is complex. However, nature is often compliant to our simple models, and part of the art is to reduce the problem to a soluble one, and part of the beauty of science is often that the simple model with the simple answers give the right ones. This article reviews the applicability of some physical models to olfaction and looks in particular at one theory within the realm of olfactory science. This theory was first endorsed by Turin in 1996, that smell signalling may be based on a form of Inelastic Electron Tunnelling (IETS). This review looks at the mystery of olfaction and the physical principles that may unveil such mysterious phenomena.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00107514.2011.597565

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hartmann-Hahn resonances allow a sensor not resonant with an external signal to be driven at a strength that leads to dressed states whose splitting matches the external signal frequency, permitting a strong coherent response.

    “This problem may be overcome by continuously driving the electron spin in the sensor at a strength that leads to dressed states whose splitting matches the frequency of the external signal and thus permits a strong coherent response of the sensor (transitions between upper and lower dressed states) [80-82].”

    From Vibrations, quanta and biology (2013) · cites this paper as [81]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 21

Authors
Brookes, J. C.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Brookes, Jennifer C.
Venue
Contemporary Physics
Published
2011-09
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
385-402
ISSN
  • 0010-7514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5812
OpenAlex
W2133319088
Cited by
21
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Contemporary Physics (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
Keywords
olfaction, odorant recognition, inelastic electron tunneling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review