CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 169Physics of Superconductivity and MagnetismLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Photo-induced superconductivity

Cavalleri, Andrea·2018·Contemporary Physics
DOI 10.1080/00107514.2017.1406623
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Recent advances in laser technology have made it possible to generate of precisely shaped strong-field pulses at terahertz frequencies. These pulses are especially useful to selectively drive collective modes of solids, for example, to drive materials in a fashion similar to what done in the synthetic environment of optical lattices. One of the most interesting applications involves the creation of non-equilibrium phases with new emergent properties. Here, I discuss coherent control of the lattice to favour superconductivity at ‘ultra-high’ temperatures, sometimes far above the thermodynamic critical temperature Tc.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00107514.2017.1406623

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The estimate of FTPA ≈ 750 mJ/cm2 is nearly three orders of magnitude larger than the fluences used in the K3C60 measurements.

    “Using the parameters for the K3C60 measurements and setting β ≈ 30 cm / GW, the value for GaAs at λ = 1064 nm [1], we obtain an estimate of F TPA ≈ 750 mJ / cm 2 . This is nearly three orders of magnitude larger than the fluences used in the K3C60 measurements”

    From Optical Saturation Produces Spurious Evidence for Photoinduced Superconductivity in K 3 C 60 (2023) · cites this paper as [1]

  • TPA is not the dominant nonlinearity in the K3C60 measurements.

    “This is nearly three orders of magnitude larger than the fluences used in the K3C60 measurements, which supports our conclusion that TPA is not the dominant nonlinearity.”

    From Optical Saturation Produces Spurious Evidence for Photoinduced Superconductivity in K 3 C 60 (2023) · cites this paper as [1]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 88

  1. 10.1126/science.280.5371.1925 · DOI
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.237401 · DOI
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.067405 · DOI
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.037401 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/nphys1831 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.physb.2009.11.080 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.217401 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/nmat1979 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.1460 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.2834 · DOI
  11. 10.1364/AOP.8.000401 · DOI
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.3.2063 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/(ISSN)1521-3951 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.35.9278 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/nphys2055 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.ssc.2013.06.024 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.197601 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/nature06119 · DOI
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.197404 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.241104 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/science.235.4793.1196 · DOI
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.40.7391 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/375561a0 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.38.4596 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.104506 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/0921-4534(89)90111-1 · DOI
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.44.7749 · DOI
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.167008 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.100502 · DOI
  30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.092503 · DOI
  31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4590 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.physc.2005.02.052 · DOI
  33. 10.1143/JPSJ.73.1123 · DOI
  34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.057004 · DOI
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.100510 · DOI
  36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.067001 · DOI
  37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.127003 · DOI
  38. Rajasekaran S, Probing opticaly silent superfluid stripes in cuprates
  39. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2317 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/374434a0 · DOI
  41. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.1455 · DOI
  42. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.2394 · DOI
  43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.3511 · DOI
  44. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.500 · DOI
  45. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.157002 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/nphys178 · DOI
  47. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.195101 · DOI
  48. 10.1107/S0108767383000057 · DOI
  49. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.134510 · DOI
  50. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.047003 · DOI
  51. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.140502 · DOI
  52. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.067001 · DOI
  53. 10.1088/0034-4885/62/1/002 · DOI
  54. 10.1038/nature05881 · DOI
  55. 10.1038/18402 · DOI
  56. 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.024530 · DOI
  57. 10.1007/BF02548125 · DOI
  58. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.047006 · DOI
  59. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.127003 · DOI
  60. 10.1038/srep07017 · DOI
  61. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.094308 · DOI
  62. Hayes W, 1978, Scattering of light by crystals
  63. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.144304 · DOI
  64. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.104507 · DOI
  65. 10.1038/350600a0 · DOI
  66. 10.1126/science.1071122 · DOI
  67. 10.1126/science.254.5034.989 · DOI
  68. 10.1142/5404 · DOI
  69. Laplace Y, 2017, Adv Phys X, 1, 387
  70. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.184506 · DOI
  71. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.087002 · DOI
  72. 10.1364/OL.42.000129 · DOI
  73. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.195139 · DOI
  74. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.014512 · DOI
  75. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.045125 · DOI
  76. 10.1140/epjb/e2016-70528-1 · DOI
  77. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.085104 · DOI
  78. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.137001 · DOI
  79. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.104507 · DOI
  80. 10.1038/nphys3819 · DOI
  81. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.227001 · DOI
  82. Okamoto J, Transiently enhanced interlayer tunneling in optically driven High Tc superconductors
  83. 10.1038/nphys4024 · DOI
  84. 10.1038/srep03823 · DOI
  85. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.187401 · DOI
  86. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.155152 · DOI
  87. Mazza G, 2017, Non-equilibrium superconductivity in driven alkali-doped fullerites
  88. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.144506 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cavalleri, A.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Cavalleri, Andrea
ORCID
Cavalleri, Andrea
Venue
Contemporary Physics
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2017-12-11
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
31-46
ISSN
  • 0010-7514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5812
DOI
10.1080/00107514.2017.1406623
OpenAlex
W2771774738
Cited by
169
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Contemporary Physics (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Keywords
coherent control, non-equilibrium phases, high-temperature superconductivity, optical lattices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review