The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The long‐term effectiveness of anti‐bullying work in primary schools
Abstract
Summary The DFE Sheffield Anti‐Bullying Project showed that schools can reduce the problem of bullying through the use of whole‐school anti‐bullying policies, curriculum exercises, environmental improvements and individual work with bullies and victims. However, the length of time necessary to plan these interventions meant that, in many cases, the work was not completed when the project evaluations ended. This study investigates the continuing progress made in primary schools in the year after the end of the project. Eleven heads took part in interviews; all schools had made some progress with policy development, and all used some curriculum resources. Most had continued with environmental improvements, but few had used the methods for dealing with bullies and victims. Four schools then administered the Olweus bullying questionnaire to all pupils between ages seven and eleven, 657 children taking part. Two schools had a consistent decline in reported bullying, one experienced a consistent rise and the other an initial fall and subsequent rise. Important factors influencing success appeared to be the extent of the consultation exercise and the date of implementation of the anti‐bullying policy. All four schools had reduced bullying among boys, but three experienced a rise in bullying among girls. Anti‐bullying work may have been influenced by a male stereotype of bullying behaviour: efforts are necessary to raise awareness and promote honesty among girls. No school had raised the proportion of victims who had told staff about being bullied.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Olweus, D. (1994) · The Plenum Series in Social/Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-9116-7_5 · Cited by 1,890
Cited by
The Nature and Extent of Bullying at School
Dake, J. A., Price, J. H., & Telljohann, S. K. (2003) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2003.tb03599.x · Cited by 478
SMITH, P. K., & SHU, S. (2000) · Childhood · doi:10.1177/0907568200007002005 · Cited by 406
Self-citationBullying, Victimization, and Sexual Harassment During the Transition to Middle School
Pellegrini, A. D. (2002) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3703_2 · Cited by 390
Chan, H. C. (., & Wong, D. S. W. (2015) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.010 · Cited by 278
Assessment of School Anti-Bullying Interventions: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
Fraguas, D., Díaz-Caneja, C. M., Ayora, M., Durán-Cutilla, M., Abregú-Crespo, R., Ezquiaga-Bravo, I., Martín-Babarro, J., & Arango, C. (2021) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3541 · Cited by 195
Metadata
- Authors
- Eslea, M., & Smith, P. K.
- Venue
- Educational Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-218
- ISSN
- 0013-1881 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5847
- OpenAlex
- W2115996458
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The long‐term effectiveness of anti‐bullying work in primary schools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0013188980400208
- The paper
- Eslea, M., & Smith, P. K. (1998). The long‐term effectiveness of anti‐bullying work in primary schools. Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188980400208
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.