Cited by 2Critical and Liberation PedagogyEducational Philosophies and PedagogiesCritical Race Theory in Education

Classroom Communities, Pandemic Portals: Rethinking Solidarity Through Pedagogy and Practice

El Sabbagh, Jinan, Schwarz, Corinne·2023·Educational Studies

Abstract

The P-16 classroom, already a space of potential conflicts and contradictions, gained new levels of complexity with the overlapping crises of 2020 onward: the COVID-19 pandemic; police brutality and corresponding “summer of abolition;” book and mask bans; and anti-critical race theory and anti-social emotional learning legislation. In this paper, we respond to these crises with collaboration through the concept of interdependency. Using disability and transformative justice organizer Mia Mingus’s definition of interdependency, we argue that an interdependent classroom can be a way out of narratives of atomized disconnection. Interdependency sees an individual’s survival as inherently connected to a larger community, emphasizing solidarity over the illusion of independence. Inspired by duoethnographic methods, we share our own reflections as students and teachers in classrooms where connection may or may not have been present. We find that, though we cannot go back to “normal,” we can go forward into new classroom context where white supremacist ideologies do not shape students’ and teachers’ shared learning experiences. Instead, interdependence can serve as a form of creative resistance to the more implicit forms of harm embedded in educational experiences, opening up platforms to counter marginalization and speak against what has been traditionally silenced.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00131946.2023.2169692

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • El Sabbagh and Schwarz (2023) offered ways to create inclusive spaces through 'interdependent classrooms' that consider an individual student's learning as connected to every student's learning.

    “El Sabbagh and Schwarz (2023) offered ways to create these spaces through”

    From Evolving intersections: AI, disability, and academic integrity in higher education (2025) · cites this paper as El Sabbagh and Schwarz (2023)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
El Sabbagh, J., & Schwarz, C.
Affiliations
  • Oklahoma State University
  • Oklahoma State University (US)
Venue
Educational Studies
Published
2023-02-01
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
221-235
ISSN
  • 0013-1946 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6993
OpenAlex
W4318824725
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Critical and Liberation Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
Keywords
interdependence, solidarity, classroom community, COVID-19 pandemic, police brutality, abolition, book bans, social-emotional learning, white supremacy, creative resistance, marginalized students, teacher-student relationship, P-16 education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review