The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of systems failures in successful paediatric cardiac surgery
Abstract
Patient safety will benefit from an approach to human error that examines systemic causes, rather than blames individuals. This study describes a direct observation methodology, based on a threat and error model, prospectively to identify types and sources of systems failures in paediatric cardiac surgery. Of substantive interest were the range, frequency and types of failures that could be identified and whether minor failures could accumulate to form more serious events, as has been the case in other industries. Check lists, notes and video recordings were employed to observe 24 successful operations. A total of 366 failures were recorded. Coordination and communication problems, equipment problems, a relaxed safety culture, patient-related problems and perfusion-related problems were most frequent, with a smaller number of skill, knowledge and decision-making failures. Longer and more risky operations were likely to generate a greater number of minor failures than shorter and lower risk operations, and in seven higher-risk cases frequently occurring minor failures accumulated to threaten the safety of the patient. Non-technical errors were more prevalent than technical errors and task threats were the most prevalent systemic source of error. Adverse events in surgery are likely to be associated with a number of recurring and prospectively identifiable errors. These may be co-incident and cumulative human errors predisposed by threats embedded in the system, rather than due to individual incompetence or negligence. Prospectively identifying and reducing these recurrent failures would lead to improved surgical standards and enhanced patient safety.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reason, J. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139062367 · Cited by 5,108
Teasdale, G. M. (2002) · British Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.1080/02688690220148815 · Cited by 1,063
Fletcher, G., Flin, R., McGeorge, P., Glavin, R., Maran, N., & Patey, R. (2003) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aeg112 · Cited by 958
The measurement of active errors: methodological issues.
Lilford, R. J. (2003) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qhc.12.suppl_2.ii8 · Cited by 101
Cited by
CATCHPOLE, K. R., DE LEVAL, M. R., MCEWAN, A., PIGOTT, N., ELLIOTT, M. J., MCQUILLAN, A., MACDONALD, C., & GOLDMAN, A. J. (2007) · Pediatric Anesthesia · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02239.x · Cited by 516
Self-citationMcCulloch, P., Mishra, A., Handa, A., Dale, T., Hirst, G., & Catchpole, K. (2009) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.2008.032045 · Cited by 393
Self-citationWahr, J. A., Prager, R. L., Abernathy, J. H., Martinez, E. A., Salas, E., Seifert, P. C., Groom, R. C., Spiess, B. D., Searles, B. E., Sundt, T. M., et al. (2013) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e3182a38efa · Cited by 334
Lawton, R., McEachan, R. R. C., Giles, S. J., Sirriyeh, R., Watt, I. S., & Wright, J. (2012) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000443 · Cited by 311
Nathan, M., Gauvreau, K., Liu, H., Pigula, F. A., Mayer, J. E., Colan, S. D., & del Nido, P. J. (2014) · The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.07.073 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Catchpole, K. R., Giddings, A. E. B., de Leval, M. R., Peek, G. J., Godden, P. J., Utley, M., Gallivan, S., Hirst, G., & Dale, T.
- Venue
- Ergonomics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-04-15
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 567-588
- ISSN
- 0014-0139 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5847
- OpenAlex
- W2098896426
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of systems failures in successful paediatric cardiac surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00140130600568865
- The paper
- Catchpole, K. R., Giddings, A. E. B., de Leval, M. R., Peek, G. J., Godden, P. J., Utley, M., Gallivan, S., Hirst, G., & Dale, T. (2006). Identification of systems failures in successful paediatric cardiac surgery. Ergonomics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130600568865
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.