CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 200Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyMuscle activation and electromyography studiesThermoregulation and physiological responses

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The relationship between maximum isometric strength and intramuscular circulatory occlusion

BARNES, WILLIAM S.·1980·Ergonomics
DOI 10.1080/00140138008924748
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Twenty male college students served as subjects for lhe study which investigated the relationship between maximum isometric strength and the isometric tension necessary to produce total occlusion of intramuscular circulation. Subjects performed a scries of progressively increasing static contractions by squeezing a hand dynamometer and the subsequent blood flow responses were measured. Blood flow was occluded at a mean of 63-5% maximum handgrip strength for the total group tested. To determine whether individuals of different maximum strength occlude at different percentages of their MVC, subjects were divided into high and low strength groups. The high strength group was found to occlude at 51-5% of MVC while the low strength group occluded at 75-5% of MVC. A significant negative correlation (r= -0.58) was found between maximum isometric strength and the per cent of maximum strength necessary to produce intra-muscular occlusion. There was no significant difference between the absolute tension producing occlusion in the high strength group (34-8 kg) and that of the low strength group (34 3 kg).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00140138008924748

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. BOWIE W., 1972, Research Quarterly, 43, 131
  2. CARLSON B., 1971, Research Quarterly, 42, 244
  3. CLARKE D. H., 1962, Research Quarterly, 33, 349
  4. COOPER K.E., 1950, Clinical Science, 9, 31
  5. HEYWARD V. H., 1975, Research Quarterly, 46, 393
  6. ROYCE J., 1958, Research Quarterly, 29, 204
  7. TUTTLE W., 1955, Research Quarterly, 26, 96

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 200

Related

Metadata

Authors
BARNES, W. S.
Affiliations
University of Northern Colorado (US)
Corresponding author
BARNES, WILLIAM S.
Venue
Ergonomics
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1980-04
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
351-357
ISSN
  • 0014-0139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5847
DOI
10.1080/00140138008924748
OpenAlex
W2007236731
Cited by
200
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ergonomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Keywords
occlusion, grip strength, isometric contraction, muscle tension, hand dynamometer, strength variability, muscle blood flow
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Flow Velocity, Humans, Male, Muscle Contraction, Muscles, Regional Blood Flow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review