Cited by 137Sleep and Work-Related FatigueCircadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and related disorders

Circadian characteristics influencing interindividual differences in tolerance and adjustment to shiftwork

COSTA, GIOVANNI, LIEVORE, FRANCESCA, CASALETTI, GIOVANNI, GAFFURI, EDOARDO, FOLKARD, SIMON·1989·Ergonomics

Abstract

The study was carried out to evaluate whether shiftworkers showing different long-term tolerance to shiftwork differ in their circadian adjustments and/or in some behavioural characteristics. Three groups of eight workers, engaged on three shifts in a graphic plant and matched for age and work experience, were selected according to the presence or not of complaints related to shiftwork: (1) no complaints; (2) nervous complaints (anxiety/depression, severe sleep disturbances); (3) digestive disorders (gastroduodenitis, peptic ulcer). They answered questionnaires on family conditions, health status, rigidity of sleeping habits, ability to overcome drowsiness, morningness, manifest anxiety. They also recorded several physiological parameters (oral temperature, grip strength, peak expiratory flow rate, pulse rate, sleep hours) during day and night-shifts. The data obtained indicate that the characteristics of flexibility of sleeping habits, ability to overcome drowsiness, and lower manifest anxiety, are associated with better tolerance to shiftwork. These characteristics do not seem to influence the adjustment of the circadian rhythm of oral temperature passing from day to night-shifts and vice versa. Conversely, morningness appeared to be unrelated to long-term tolerance, but did influence circadian adjustments and sleep behaviour. Among the groups, the subjects with digestive disorders showed a greater phase shift and a reduction of the amplitude on night-work, suggesting a pos…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00140138908966104

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 137

Authors
COSTA, G., LIEVORE, F., CASALETTI, G., GAFFURI, E., & FOLKARD, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Venue
Ergonomics
Published
1989-04
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
373-385
ISSN
  • 0014-0139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5847
OpenAlex
W2078010107
Cited by
137
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ergonomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
shift work, circadian rhythm, chronotype, sleepiness, anxiety, gastrointestinal diseases, oral temperature, sleep behaviour, phase shift, peak expiratory flow, grip strength, pulse rate
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Circadian Rhythm, Humans, Individuality, Male, Middle Aged, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Work, Work Schedule Tolerance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review