Ergonomics in bed design: the effect of spinal alignment on sleep parameters
Abstract
This study combines concepts of bed design and sleep registrations to investigate how quality of spine support affects the manifestation of sleep in healthy subjects. Altogether, 17 normal sleepers (nine males, eight females; age 24.3±7.1 years) participated in an anthropometric screening, prior to the actual sleep experiments, during which personalised sleep system settings were determined according to individual body measures. Sleep systems (i.e. mattress and supporting structure) with an adjustable stiffness distribution were used. Subjects spent three nights of 8 h in bed in the sleep laboratory in a counterbalanced order (adaptation, personalised support and sagging support). During these nights, polysomnography was performed. Subjective sleep data were gathered by means of questionnaires. Results show that individual posture preferences are a determinant factor in the extent that subjects experience a negative effect while sleeping on a sagging sleep system. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE: This study investigated how spine support affects sleep in healthy subjects, finding that the relationship between bedding and sleep quality is affected by individual anthropometry and sleep posture. In particular, results indicate that a sagging sleep system negatively affects sleep quality for people sleeping in a prone or lateral posture.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An uncomfortable sleeping environment may reduce sleep ability.
“Although data on beds and other sleeping surfaces are relatively scarce, an uncomfortable sleeping environment may also reduce sleep ability.237–239”
From Sleep, Health, and Society (2017) · cites this paper as [239]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 70
- Authors
- Verhaert, V., Haex, B., Wilde, T. D., Berckmans, D., Verbraecken, J., Valck, E. D., & Sloten, J. V.
- Affiliations
- KU Leuven (BE)
- b M3- BIORES , Katholieke Universiteit Leuven , Heverlee , Belgium
- Antwerp University Hospital (BE)
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Verhaert, Vincent
- Venue
- Ergonomics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 169-178
- ISSN
- 0014-0139 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5847
- OpenAlex
- W2164814403
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ergonomics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Textile materials and evaluations
- Keywords
- bed design, spinal alignment, sleep quality, sleep position, anthropometry, prone sleeping, polysomnography
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Analysis of Variance, Beds, Equipment Design, Female, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Ergonomics, Male, Pain Measurement, Posture, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Spine, Polysomnography, Dyssomnias, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review