The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct observation of driving, self reports of driver behaviour, and accident involvement
Abstract
Forty-eight drivers answered a set of written questions about their driving style and drove a pre-defined, mixed urban and motorway route under observation. For 20 drivers there was a second observer in the car to check on inter-observer reliability. Relationships were examined between self-reports of driver behaviour and observers' reports, and between both of these and the number of accidents in which the drivers had been involved in the past three years. The results indicated that there was good inter-observer agreement on a number of important variables including speed, calmness, and attentiveness. Inter-observer reliability for other variables was less good; among these were preferred distance to car in front, use of indicators, and aggressiveness. Observers also showed good agreement on overall ratings of driver skill and safety. Observed speed on the motorway correlated well with drivers' self reports of normal driving speed. Observer ratings of calmness correlated significantly with self-reports of calmness. Also observer ratings of attentiveness and carefulness correlated significantly with self-reports of deviant driving behaviour. Observed speed on the motorway showed a clear positive correlation with self-reported accident involvement. The results indicate that self-reports of certain aspects of driver behaviour can be used as surrogates for observational measures, thus providing a convenient extension to the researcher's methodological armoury. One such aspect is speed which appears to play an important role in accident involvement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Accident risk and risk-taking behaviour among young drivers
Jonah, B. A. (1986) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/0001-4575(86)90041-2 · Cited by 472
Cited by
Elander, J., West, R., & French, D. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.113.2.279 · Cited by 788
Self-citationThe multidimensional driving style inventory—scale construct and validation
Taubman-Ben-Ari, O., Mikulincer, M., & Gillath, O. (2004) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/s0001-4575(03)00010-1 · Cited by 579
A Review of Research on Driving Styles and Road Safety
Sagberg, F., Selpi, Bianchi Piccinini, G. F., & Engström, J. (2015) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720815591313 · Cited by 443
Risk-taking attitudes and risky driving behaviour
Iversen, H. (2004) · Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2003.11.003 · Cited by 287
The effects of music tempo on simulated driving performance and vehicular control
Brodsky, W. (2001) · Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s1369-8478(01)00025-0 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- WEST, R., FRENCH, D., KEMP, R., & ELANDER, J.
- Venue
- Ergonomics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-05
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 557-567
- ISSN
- 0014-0139 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5847
- OpenAlex
- W2059373554
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct observation of driving, self reports of driver behaviour, and accident involvement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00140139308967912
- The paper
- WEST, R., FRENCH, D., KEMP, R., & ELANDER, J. (1993). Direct observation of driving, self reports of driver behaviour, and accident involvement. Ergonomics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139308967912
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.