The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An assessment of neck and upper extremity disorders by questionnaire and clinical examination
Abstract
To study the usefulness of a screening questionnaire for neck/upper extremity complaints, 165 women in either repetitive industrial, or mobile and varied work, were studied by the questionnaire and by a detailed clinical physical examination. A total of 94 subjects recorded complaints in the questionnaire. In 140 subjects findings were recorded at the examination. Most subjects with findings at the clinical examination of shoulders reported complaints in the questionnaire (sensitivity 80%). For the other anatomical regions, the sensitivity was rather low (42-65%). For all regions, most subjects without findings reported no complaints (specificity 77-97%). A total of 75 subjects were given clinical diagnoses according to a set of predetermined diagnostic criteria. The capacity of the questionnaire to identify diagnoses of shoulders was higher (sensitivity 92%) than for the other regions (66-79%). Of subjects who did not qualify for diagnosis, a majority (specificity 71-81%) did not report complaints in the questionnaire. We conclude that the questionnaire approach gives a fairly good picture of the neck/upper extremity status of a working female population. However, a clear view of the size of a problem is obtained only by a detailed clinical examination, particularly as regards the neck, elbows and hands, for which the questionnaire gave an underestimate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire
Crawford, J. O. (2007) · Occupational Medicine · doi:10.1093/occmed/kqm036 · Cited by 435
Nordander, C., Ohlsson, K., Åkesson, I., Arvidsson, I., Balogh, I., Hansson, G.-Å., Strömberg, U., Rittner, R., & Skerfving, S. (2013) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2012.07.009 · Cited by 97
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- OHLSSON, K., ATTEWELL, R. G., JOHNSSON, B., AHLM, A., & SKERFVING, S.
- Venue
- Ergonomics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 891-897
- ISSN
- 0014-0139 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5847
- OpenAlex
- W2133694283
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An assessment of neck and upper extremity disorders by questionnaire and clinical examination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00140139408963698
- The paper
- OHLSSON, K., ATTEWELL, R. G., JOHNSSON, B., AHLM, A., & SKERFVING, S. (1994). An assessment of neck and upper extremity disorders by questionnaire and clinical examination. Ergonomics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139408963698
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.