The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The influence of VDT work on musculoskeletal disorders
Abstract
Relationships between visual display terminal (VDT) use and musculoskeletal problems were examined in a group of 353 office workers, using data from medical and workplace investigations as well as questionnaires. There were no general differences between VDT and non-VDT users as to the occurrence of muscle problems. Combinations of specific VDT work situations such as data entry work or work with a VDT for more than 20 h/week and the presence of some other factors were, however, associated with excess risks of certain muscle problems. The extraneous factors involved in the definitions of such risk groups were: use of bifocal or progressive glasses at a VDT; stomach-related stress reactions; limited rest break opportunity; repetitive movements; non-use of lower arm support; and possibly the vertical position of the keyboard; and presence of specular glare.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Physical risk factors for neck pain
Ariëns, G. A., van Mechelen, W., Bongers, P. M., Bouter, L. M., & van der Wal, G. (2000) · Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.504 · Cited by 525
The Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire
Crawford, J. O. (2007) · Occupational Medicine · doi:10.1093/occmed/kqm036 · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- BERGQVIST, U., WOLGAST, E., NILSSON, B., & Voss, M.
- Venue
- Ergonomics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 754-762
- ISSN
- 0014-0139 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5847
- OpenAlex
- W2035858209
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The influence of VDT work on musculoskeletal disorders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00140139508925147
- The paper
- BERGQVIST, U., WOLGAST, E., NILSSON, B., & Voss, M. (1995). The influence of VDT work on musculoskeletal disorders. Ergonomics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925147
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
