The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of keyboard tray geometry on upper body posture and comfort
Abstract
The effects of a downward-tilting (DT) keyboard tray on wrist posture, seated posture and self-assessed musculoskeletal discomfort were investigated in a field experiment. Thirty-eight professional office workers were studied. A pretest assessed how they typed using either a conventional keyboard on a desk or on an articulating keyboard tray, and with or without wrist rests. Workers were randomly allocated to a control (n = 15) or test group (n = 23) that used their existing keyboard in a DT system. A post-test was conducted 3 weeks later. Results showed no significant changes in wrist posture, seated posture or reports of musculoskeletal discomfort for the control group, and approximately 50% of typing wrist movements put the hand in a neutral zone. There were significant improvements in wrist posture, seated posture and upper body musculoskeletal discomfort for the test group using the DT system. Over 80% of typing wrist movements put the hand into a neutral zone with the DT arrangement. Reactions to using a conventional keyboard on a DT system were positive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders
McAtamney, L., & Nigel Corlett, E. (1993) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/0003-6870(93)90080-s · Cited by 3,361
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting
Kluge, A., Badura, B., Urbas, L., & Burkolter, D. (2010) · Cited by 1,125
Evaluation of human work: A practical ergonomics methodology
Wilson, J. R., & Corlett, E. N. (1991) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/0003-6870(91)90014-9 · Cited by 497
Peripheral nerve-conduction block by high muscle-compartment pressure.
Hargens, A. R., Romine, J. S., Sipe, J. C., Evans, K. L., Mubarak, S. J., & Akeson, W. H. (1979) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-197961020-00006 · Cited by 186
Corlett, E. N. (1987) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/0003-6870(87)90018-4 · Cited by 131
Hedge, A., & Powers, J. R. (1995) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139508925122 · Cited by 89
Self-citationThe impact of keyboard design on comfort and productivity in a text-entry task
Swanson, N. G., Galinsky, T. L., Cole, L. L., Pan, C. S., & Sauter, S. L. (1997) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/s0003-6870(96)00052-x · Cited by 70
Aspects on Pathophysiology of Nerve Entrapments and Nerve Compression Injuries
Dahlin, L. B. (1991) · Neurosurgery Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s1042-3680(18)30754-x · Cited by 63
Ergonomic Test of the Kinesis Keyboard
Smith, W. J., & Cronin, D. T. (1993) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193129303700414 · Cited by 17
Cited by
Workplace interventions for neck pain in workers
Aas, R. W., Tuntland, H., Holte, K. A., Røe, C., Lund, T., Marklund, S., & Moller, A. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008160.pub2 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Hedge, A., Morimoto, S., & Mccrobie, D.
- Venue
- Ergonomics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1333-1349
- ISSN
- 0014-0139 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5847
- OpenAlex
- W2134174497
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 5.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of keyboard tray geometry on upper body posture and comfort. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/001401399184983
- The paper
- Hedge, A., Morimoto, S., & Mccrobie, D. (1999). Effects of keyboard tray geometry on upper body posture and comfort. Ergonomics. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401399184983
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.