Alice Walker's “Everyday Use”
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Everyday Use is regarded as the awakening of Mama to the superficiality of one of her daughters and the deep-seated understanding of heritage of the other.
“Focusing on this fact, Everyday Use is regarded as the awakening of Mama to the superficiality of one of her daughters and the deep-seated understanding of heritage of the other one (Tuten 1993: 125).”
From A New Historicist Perspective on the Transformation in Perception of Cultural Heritage in Alice Walker’s Everyday Use (2024) · cites this paper as Tuten 1993: 125
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ulucan, Ö. (2024) · İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.15869/itobiad.1522013 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tuten, N.
- Corresponding author
- Tuten, Nancy
- Venue
- The Explicator
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125-128
- ISSN
- 0014-4940 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-926X
- OpenAlex
- W1968873093
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Explicator (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › American and British Literature Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › American Literature and Culture
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Short Stories in Global Literature
- Keywords
- Alice Walker, everyday use, short stories, African American literature, family relationships, cultural heritage, mother-daughter relationships
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
