The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Internal bias in ferroelectric ceramics: Origin and time dependence
Abstract
The internal bias field which is observed in many ferroelectric materials is explained semiquantita-tively. Dipolar defects in the ferroelectric cause div P # O at the defect sites. The electric fields diverging at these sites tend to orient the dipoles to energetically favourable orientations. The free energy is modified by this effect in a similar way as by an electric field. The transient relaxation of the dipoles to the new equilibrium is treated and describes well the observed time behaviour of the internal bias.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
BaTiO3-Based Piezoelectrics: Fundamentals, Current Status, and Perspectives
Acosta, M., Novak, N., Rojas, V., Patel, S., Vaish, R., Koruza, J., Rossetti, G. A., & Rödel, J. (2017) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.4990046 · Cited by 1,451
Jo, W., Dittmer, R., Acosta, M., Zang, J., Groh, C., Sapper, E., Wang, K., & Rödel, J. (2012) · Journal of Electroceramics · doi:10.1007/s10832-012-9742-3 · Cited by 964
Metadata
- Authors
- Arlt, G., & Neumann, H.
- Venue
- Ferroelectrics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1988-11
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 109-120
- ISSN
- 0015-0193 (ISSN-L)
- 1563-5112
- OpenAlex
- W2017912115
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Internal bias in ferroelectric ceramics: Origin and time dependence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00150198808201374
- The paper
- Arlt, G., & Neumann, H. (1988). Internal bias in ferroelectric ceramics: Origin and time dependence. Ferroelectrics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150198808201374
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
