The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Turkish and Mongol Shamanism in the Middle Ages
Abstract
(1972). Turkish and Mongol Shamanism in the Middle Ages. Folklore: Vol. 83, No. 3, pp. 177-193.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Since the thirteenth century, the supportive imperial policies also had contributed to the steady development of astronomical science.”
From Mongol Superstition versus Christian Rationality: Literary Representations of Astrology and Divination in the Mongol Empire by European Travelers (2026) · cites this paper as [13]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Li, Y. (2026) · International Journal of Divination and Prognostication · doi:10.1163/25899201-bja10036
Metadata
- Authors
- Boyle, J. A.
- Corresponding author
- Boyle, John Andrew
- Venue
- Folklore
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1972-09
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 177-193
- ISSN
- 0015-587X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8315
- OpenAlex
- W2047571286
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Folklore (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Cultural and Sociopolitical Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Turkic and Altaic Linguistics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Eurasian Exchange Networks
- Keywords
- shamanism, Turkic peoples, Mongols
- MeSH terms
- Medicine, Traditional, Turkey, History, Medieval
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Turkish and Mongol Shamanism in the Middle Ages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0015587x.1972.9716468
- The paper
- Boyle, J. A. (1972). Turkish and Mongol Shamanism in the Middle Ages. Folklore. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015587x.1972.9716468
