The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Grounding Recognition: A Rejoinder to Critical Questions
Abstract
It is always great good fortune for an author to have his writings meet with a receptive circle of readers who take them up in their own work and clarify them further. Indeed, it may even be the secret of all theoretical productivity that one reaches an opportune point in one's own creative process when others' queries, suggestions, and criticisms give one no peace, until one has been forced to come up with new answers and solutions. The four essays collected here, in any event, jointly represent an ideal form of such a challenge: I am now compelled to make further theoretical developments and clarifications that lead me to a whole new stage of my own endeavours, well beyond what I initially had in mind in The Struggle for Recognition . For this reason, I will not concentrate here on interpretative issues regarding my earlier work but will instead take up the problems and challenges that have occasioned several revisions on my part. For this reason, it makes sense to begin (in section I) with the points that Carl-Göran Heidegren makes, in terms of a history of social theory, regarding my proposed theory of recognition. The issues that still motivate me today can best be expressed via an engagement with the conscientious interpretations he offers. The core of this rejoinder is based on Heikki Ikäheimo's and Arto Laitinen's suggestions and corrections, which they have used to develop my initial approach further, to the point where the theoretical outlines of a precise and general concept of recognition come into view. It is primarily these two contributions that helped me develop a productive elaboration of my originally vague intuitions (section II). By way of conclusion (in section III), I take up the penetrating questions raised by Antti Kauppinen regarding the use of the concept of recognition in the broader context of social criticism; he has compelled me to take on several extremely helpful clarifications, and they give me the opportunity, in conclusion, to summarize my overarching intentions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection
Butler, J. (1997) · doi:10.1515/9781503616295 · Cited by 4,949
Redistribution or Recognition?: A Political-Philosophical Exchange
Fraser, N. W., Honneth, A., Golb, J. D., Ingram, J. D., & Wilke, C. (2003) · Cited by 3,426
Self-citationThe Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection
Butler, J. (1997) · Cited by 2,944
The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays
Frankfurt, H. G. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818172 · Cited by 2,634
The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and the Problem of Domination
Benjamin, J. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,172
The struggle for recognition: the moral grammar of social conflicts
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-3840 · Cited by 2,146
The Struggle for Recognition: On Sartre’s Theory of Intersubjectivity
(1995) · The Fragmented World of the Social · doi:10.2307/jj.18253805.13 · Cited by 1,161
Value, Respect, and Attachment
Raz, J. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612732 · Cited by 482
Metadata
- Authors
- Honneth, A.
- Venue
- Inquiry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 499-519
- ISSN
- 0020-174X (ISSN-L)
- 1502-3923
- OpenAlex
- W2047265492
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 27.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Grounding Recognition: A Rejoinder to Critical Questions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/002017402320947577
- The paper
- Honneth, A. (2002). Grounding Recognition: A Rejoinder to Critical Questions. Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1080/002017402320947577
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.