The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assembly, accretion, and break-up of the Palaeo-Mesoproterozoic Columbia supercontinent: record in the North China Craton revisited
Abstract
Columbia is a Palaeo-Mesoproterozoic supercontinent that was assembled during global 2.0–1.8 Ga collisional events, underwent long-lived, subduction-related accretion at key continental margins in the period 1.8–1.3 Ga, commenced to fragment ∼1.6 Ga ago, and finally broke up at ∼1.3 Ga. Similar to most other cratonic blocks (Laurentia, Baltica, Siberia, Amazonia, West African, South Africa, India, Australia, and Antarctica), the North China Craton records the history of assembly, accretion, and break-up of the Columbia supercontinent. New data indicate that the Archaean to Palaeoproterozoic basement of the North China Craton was assembled by microcontinental blocks along three Palaeoproterozoic collisional belts: the Khondalite Belt, the Jiao-Liao-Ji Belt, and the Trans-North China Orogen. The Khondalite Belt was formed by collision between the Yinshan and Ordos blocks and was amalgamated to form the Western Block at ∼1.95 Ga. The Eastern Block underwent Palaeoproterozoic rifting at 2.2–1.9 Ga to break-up into the Longgang and Nangrim blocks; then the rift basin/incipient ocean closed attending subduction and collision to form the Jiao-Liao-Ji Belt at ∼1.9 Ga. Finally, the Western and Eastern blocks collided along the Trans-North China Orogen to form the coherent basement of the North China Craton at ∼1.85 Ga. Following this final assembly, the North China Craton underwent subduction-related accretion at its southern margin during the period 1.78–1.45 Ga, forming the Xiong'er volcanic belt. At 1.6–1.2 Ga, the northern margin of the North China Craton underwent a rifting event that led to separation of the craton from other cratonic blocks of the supercontinent Columbia, forming the 1.6–1.2 Ga Zhaertai-Bayan Obo rift zone and associated 1.35 Ga mafic sills along the northern margin of the craton. These data indicate that in any configuration of Columbia, the southern margin of the North China Craton must have faced an open ocean, whereas its northern margin was connected to another continental block.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sun, S.-S., & McDonough, W. F. (1989) · Geological Society, London, Special Publications · doi:10.1144/gsl.sp.1989.042.01.19 · Cited by 16,410
Tectonic Implications of the Composition of Volcanic ARC Magmas
Pearce, J. A., & Peate, D. W. (1995) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev.ea.23.050195.001343 · Cited by 2,779
Late Archean to Paleoproterozoic evolution of the North China Craton: key issues revisited
Zhao, G., Sun, M., Wilde, S. A., & Sanzhong, L. (2005) · Precambrian Research · doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2004.10.002 · Cited by 2,702
Self-citationZhao, G., Wilde, S. A., Cawood, P. A., & Sun, M. (2001) · Precambrian Research · doi:10.1016/s0301-9268(00)00154-6 · Cited by 1,916
Self-citationReview of global 2.1–1.8 Ga orogens: implications for a pre-Rodinia supercontinent
Zhao, G., Cawood, P. A., Wilde, S. A., & Sun, M. (2002) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0012-8252(02)00073-9 · Cited by 1,670
Self-citationAdakitic magmas: Modern analogues of Archaean granitoids
Martin, H. (1999) · Lithos · doi:10.1016/s0024-4937(98)00076-0 · Cited by 1,642
Configuration of Columbia, a Mesoproterozoic Supercontinent
Rogers, J. J. W., & Santosh, M. (2002) · Gondwana Research · doi:10.1016/s1342-937x(05)70883-2 · Cited by 1,397
A Paleo-Mesoproterozoic supercontinent: assembly, growth and breakup
Zhao, G., Sun, M., Wilde, S. A., & Li, S. (2004) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2004.02.003 · Cited by 1,356
Self-citationPaleoproterozoic tectonic evolution of the North China Craton
Kusky, T. M., & Li, J. (2003) · Journal of Asian Earth Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1367-9120(03)00071-3 · Cited by 893
Zhao, G., Cawood, P. A., Wilde, S. A., Sun, M., & Lu, L. (2000) · Precambrian Research · doi:10.1016/s0301-9268(00)00076-0 · Cited by 626
Self-citation
Cited by
Zhao, G., Wang, Y., Huang, B., Dong, Y., Li, S., Zhang, G., & Yu, S. (2018) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.10.003 · Cited by 1,045
Self-citationIntroduction to tectonics of China
Zheng, Y.-F., Xiao, W.-J., & Zhao, G. (2013) · Gondwana Research · doi:10.1016/j.gr.2012.10.001 · Cited by 849
Self-citationZhang, S., Li, Z.-X., Evans, D. A. D., Wu, H., Li, H., & Dong, J. (2012) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2012.07.034 · Cited by 538
What’s in a name? The Columbia (Paleopangaea/Nuna) supercontinent
Meert, J. G. (2012) · Gondwana Research · doi:10.1016/j.gr.2011.12.002 · Cited by 400
The Columbia supercontinent revisited
Meert, J. G., & Santosh, M. (2017) · Gondwana Research · doi:10.1016/j.gr.2017.04.011 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, G., Li, S., Sun, M., & Wilde, S. A.
- Venue
- International Geology Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-02-08
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 11-12
- Pages
- 1331-1356
- ISSN
- 0020-6814 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-2839
- OpenAlex
- W1974438203
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 109
- FWCI
- 22.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assembly, accretion, and break-up of the Palaeo-Mesoproterozoic Columbia supercontinent: record in the North China Craton revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00206814.2010.527631
- The paper
- Zhao, G., Li, S., Sun, M., & Wilde, S. A. (2011). Assembly, accretion, and break-up of the Palaeo-Mesoproterozoic Columbia supercontinent: record in the North China Craton revisited. International Geology Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2010.527631
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.