Cited by 91Geological and Geochemical AnalysisPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeological and Geophysical Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

U-PB zircon tuff geochronology from the Karoo Basin, South Africa: implications of zircon recycling on stratigraphic age controls

Open access

Abstract

Along the >650 km long southern margin of the Karoo Basin in South Africa, we traversed four evenly spaced stratigraphic transects and collected 22 samples of volcanic, air-fall tuffs thought to be distal deposits derived from the Permian–Triassic Southern Gondwanan volcanic arc. We present 469 new U-Pb zircon ages determined by sensitive high-resolution ion microprobe reverse geometry (SHRIMP-RG) at the Stanford–USGS Microanalytical Center in order to constrain the maximum depositional ages for the southern Karoo Basin strata. Weighted means of these youngest coherent zircon populations were selected to maximize the number of analyses while minimizing the mean square weighted deviation (MSWD) to increase the robustness and decrease the influence of Pb-loss and inheritance in determining the maximum depositional age. Maximum depositional ages for the marine Ecca Group range from 250 to 274 Ma, whereas in the conformably overlying terrestrial Beaufort Group maximum depositional ages ranged from 257 to 452 Ma. Across the southern Karoo Basin, the Ecca Group tuffs produce maximum depositional ages that young upward; however, the Beaufort Group tuffs yield maximum depositional ages that are geochronologically out of sequence. Furthermore, maximum depositional ages of the Beaufort Group tuffs are consistently older than ash ages within the underlying marine strata. Our results are supported by previously published U-Pb tuff zircon geochronology in the Karoo Basin and demonstrate that the presence of out-of-sequence, older tuff ages are repeatable in Beaufort Group tuffs along the southern margin of the basin. We propose that tuffs in the Karoo Basin are correlative with tuffs in southern South America, and that the age spectra of these tuffs were influenced by magmatic crustal recycling. We use these data to highlight the complexity of U-Pb zircon datasets from tuffs, address the use of U-Pb zircon ages to provide absolute age controls, and discuss the implications of these new age controls on the Permian-Triassic Karoo strata.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00206814.2015.1008592

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • McKay et al. cautioned that U-Pb zircon data from tuffs from the Karoo Basin should not be interpreted as actual depositional ages but must be understood in terms of the magmatic history of their volcanic source.

    “McKay et al. (14) cautioned that U–Pb zircon data from tuffs from the Karoo Basin should not be interpreted as actual depositional ages but must be understood in terms of the magmatic history of their volcanic source.”

    From Dating the origin of dinosaurs (2016) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Discussion cautions that zircon U–Pb ages from Beaufort Group tuffs are maximum depositional-age constraints, not actual depositional ages, and says interpretation must consider the volcanic source’s magmatic history. The claim extends that caution to Karoo Basin tuffs generally, whereas the Discussion says tuffs below the proposed tuff gap may provide reliable chronostratigraphic control. Page numbers were not supplied. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Weighted U-Pb data from the Puesto Viejo Group range from about 260 to about 230 Ma, although there is general agreement that the Puesto Viejo volcanism took place between 241 and 230 Ma.

    “Weighted U–Pb data from the Puesto Viejo Group range from about 260 to about 230 Ma, although there is general agreement that the Puesto Viejo volcanism took place between 241 and 230 Ma (14).”

    From Dating the origin of dinosaurs (2016) · cites this paper as [14]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. 10.1086/499573 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.01.003 · DOI
  3. 10.5724/gcs.94.15.0023 · DOI
  4. 10.2113/0530305 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.lithos.2010.01.013 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0899-5362(02)00154-9 · DOI
  7. 10.1130/G20220.1 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.gr.2011.11.010 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.palwor.2007.05.003 · DOI
  10. 10.2475/ajs.278.10.1345 · DOI
  11. Dickinson W.R., 2008, American Journal of Science, 308, 1041
  12. 10.1029/2011JB008495 · DOI
  13. 10.2110/jsr.2007.088 · DOI
  14. 10.1130/G25685A.1 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2010.06.008 · DOI
  16. 10.2110/palo.2004.P04-62 · DOI
  17. Groenewald G.H., 1995, Reptilian biostratigraphy of the Permian-Triassic Beaufort Group (Karoo Supergroup), 29
  18. 10.1144/0016-76492010-177 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.tecto.2014.11.021 · DOI
  20. 10.1046/j.1525-1314.2000.00266.x · DOI
  21. 10.1130/GES00796.1 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.tecto.2009.02.046 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.gr.2011.07.007 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.05.017 · DOI
  25. 10.1029/AR056p0007 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.jsames.2006.09.012 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.jsames.2013.03.011 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/s005310050179 · DOI
  29. Ludwig K., 2008, Berkeley Geochronology Ctr. Special Publication, 4, 77
  30. Ludwig K., 2009, Berkeley Geochronology Center Special Publication, 5, 110
  31. 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007.04.019 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.04.035 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.jsames.2014.08.008 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1144/jgs2013-081 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.gr.2013.03.009 · DOI
  36. 10.1046/j.1440-0952.1999.00745.x · DOI
  37. 10.1144/0016-76492011-142 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.gr.2010.07.003 · DOI
  39. 10.2113/103.1.81 · DOI
  40. 10.1130/G33622.1 · DOI
  41. 10.1130/B30534.1 · DOI
  42. 10.1130/GES01033.1 · DOI
  43. 10.1126/science.1213454 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/S0016-7037(02)00839-6 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/0031-0182(94)00119-S · DOI
  46. 10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<1147:POVEAA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Spalletti L.A., 2008, Geologica Acta, 6, 267
  48. 10.1130/G21940.1 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.01.022 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2004.05.002 · DOI
  51. 10.1130/MEM184-p223 · DOI
  52. 10.1130/MEM184-p223 · DOI
  53. Vorster, C., 2013, Laser ablation ICP-MS age determination of detrital zircon populations in the Phanerozoic Cape and Lower Karoo Supergroup (South Africa) and correlatives in Argentina [Ph.D. thesis]: University of Johannesburg.
  54. Weislogel A., 2011, AAPG Search and Discovery
  55. 10.1111/j.1365-2117.2009.00409.x · DOI
  56. 10.2110/jsr.2014.28 · DOI
  57. Zeigler A.M., 1983, Tidal friction and the earth’s rotation II, 240

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McKay, M. P., Weislogel, A. L., Fildani, A., Brunt, R. L., Hodgson, D. M., & Flint, S. S.
Affiliations
  • West Virginia University (US)
  • Equinor (Norway) (NO)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
McKay, Matthew P.
Venue
International Geology Review
Published
2015-02-13
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
393-410
ISSN
  • 0020-6814 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2839
OpenAlex
W2059220646
Cited by
91
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 7
FWCI
16.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • International Geology Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • BearWorks (Missouri State University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (cc-by)
Funders
  • Geological Society of America
  • West Virginia University
  • Society for Sedimentary Geology
  • American Association of Petroleum Geology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
Keywords
zircon U-Pb geochronology, Karoo Basin, Ecca Group, Beaufort Group, maximum depositional age, zircon recycling, Permian-Triassic stratigraphy, South America

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review