Cited by 40Pain Management and Placebo EffectEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesNeural dynamics and brain function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fractal Analysis of EEG in Hypnosis and its Relationship with Hypnotizability

Lee, Jun-Seok, Spiegel, David, Kim, Sae-Byul, Lee, Jang-Han, Kim, Sun-Il, Yang, Byung-Hwan, Choi, Joon-Ho, Kho, Yong-Chul, Nam, Jung-Hyun·2007·International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

Abstract

Fractal analysis was applied to study the trends of EEG signals in the hypnotic condition. The subjects were 19 psychiatric outpatients. Hypnotizability was measured with the Hypnotic Induction Profile (HIP). Fifty-four sets of EEG data were analyzed by detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA), a well-established fractal analysis technique. The scaling exponents, which are the results of fractal analysis, are reduced toward white noise during the hypnotic condition, which differentiates the hypnotic condition from the waking condition. Further, the decrease in the scaling exponents during hypnosis was solely associated with the eye-roll sign within specific cortical areas (F3, C4, and O1/2) closely related to eye movements and attention. In conclusion, the present study has found that the application of the fractal analysis technique can demonstrate the electrophysiological correlations with hypnotic influence on cerebral activity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207140600995810

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This could account for controlled dissociative experience in hypnosis, in which perceptions ordinarily available to consciousness are put outside of conscious awareness.

    “This could account for controlled dissociative experience in hypnosis, in which perceptions ordinarily available to consciousness are put outside of conscious awareness (e.g. analgesia4, 9, 56 or alteration of color perception10), despite the apparent incongruity of this sensory alteration.”

    From Functional Brain Basis of Hypnotizability (2012) · cites this paper as [4]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. 10.1093/brain/117.5.1073 · DOI
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.381 · DOI
  3. Bassingthwaighte J. B., 1994, Fractal physiology, 10.1007/978-1-4614-7572-9 · DOI
  4. Bodis-Wollner I., 1997, Neurology, 49, 416, 10.1212/WNL.49.2.416 · DOI
  5. Corbetta M., 1993, Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 1202, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-03-01202.1993 · DOI
  6. Crawford H. J., 1992, Contemporary hypnosis research
  7. Elbert T., 1994, Physiological Reviews, 74, 1, 10.1152/physrev.1994.74.1.1 · DOI
  8. Fox P. T., 1985, Journal of Neurophysiology, 54, 348, 10.1152/jn.1985.54.2.348 · DOI
  9. Frischholz E. J., 1980, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 22, 185, 10.1080/00029157.1980.10403227 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1037/h0029278 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1006/nimg.1999.0517 · DOI
  12. Goldberger A. L., 1999, Circulation, 101, 215, 10.1161/01.CIR.101.23.e215 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90032-F · DOI
  14. 10.1037/0021-843X.104.1.123 · DOI
  15. Hilgard E, 1965, Hypnotic susceptibility
  16. 10.1159/000054942 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/00207149708416116 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0378-4371(01)00144-3 · DOI
  19. 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.8.1279 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1046/j.1365-201X.1997.00207.x · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0010-4825(01)00031-2 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/BF01129967 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0006-3223(97)00546-5 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Mandelbrot B. B, 1977, Fractals, forms, chance and dimension
  25. Mandelbrot B. B, 1982, The fractal geometry of nature
  26. Montroll E. W., 1984, Nonequilibrium phenomena II. from stochastics to hydrodynamics, 1
  27. 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.03.019 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.10.007 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.03.002 · DOI
  30. Peng C. K., 1993, Physical Review. E, Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics, 47, 3730, 10.1103/PhysRevE.47.3730 · DOI
  31. Peng C. K., 2000, Self-organized biological dynamics and nonlinear control
  32. 10.1063/1.166141 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00435-2 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/S0025-5564(98)10088-3 · DOI
  35. Price D. D, 1996, Hypnosis and suggestions in the treatment of pain, 67
  36. 10.1177/002216788002000309 · DOI
  37. Price D. D., 1990, The experiential method: Exploring the human experience, 85
  38. 10.1162/089892999563175 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1080/00207149708416131 · DOI
  40. 10.1076/iceh.51.3.256.15520 · DOI
  41. Rizzolatti G., 1987, Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect, 298
  42. 10.1016/S0006-8993(03)02431-4 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/0167-8760(90)90027-B · DOI
  44. Spiegel D, 1980, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 22, 217, 10.1080/00029157.1980.10403231 · DOI
  45. 10.1076/iceh.51.2.130.14612 · DOI
  46. Spiegel D., 1982, American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 431, 10.1176/ajp.139.10.1380-b · DOI
  47. Spiegel H, 1972, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 15, 25, 10.1080/00029157.1972.10402206 · DOI
  48. Spiegel H., 1978, Trance and treatment: Clinical uses of hypnosis
  49. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2003.09.001 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/S1090-3801(99)90183-0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lee, J.-S., Spiegel, D., Kim, S.-B., Lee, J.-H., Kim, S.-I., Yang, B.-H., Choi, J.-H., Kho, Y.-C., & Nam, J.-H.
Affiliations
  • Myongji Hospital (KR)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Hanyang University (KR)
Corresponding author
Lee, Jun-Seok
Venue
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
Published
2007-02
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
14-31
ISSN
  • 0020-7144 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5183
OpenAlex
W2000511805
Cited by
40
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
hypnosis, hypnotic susceptibility, EEG, fractal analysis, detrended fluctuation analysis, scaling exponents, eye movements, attention, brain activity
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Cerebral Cortex, Dissociative Disorders, Dominance, Cerebral, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Hypnosis, Male, Middle Aged, Relaxation, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Somatoform Disorders, Wakefulness, Fractals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review