The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Design of unknown input observers and robust fault detection filters
Abstract
Fault detection filters are a special class of observers that can generate directional residuals for the purpose of fault isolation. This paper proposes a new approach to design robust (in the disturbance de-coupling sense) fault detection filters which ensure that the residual vector, generated by this filter, has both robust and directional properties. This is done by combining the unknown input observer and fault detection filter principles. The paper proposes a new full-order unknown input observer, and gives necessary and sufficient conditions for its existence. After the disturbance de-coupling conditions are satisfied, the remaining design freedom can be used to make the residual have the directional property, based on the fault detection filter principle. A nonlinear jet engine system is used to illustrate the robust fault isolation approach presented. It is shown that linearization errors can be approximately treated as unknown disturbances and be de-coupled in the design of a robust fault detection filter. Simulation results show that mis-isolation of faults can be avoided using the robust scheme.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Linear system theory and design
Barnett, S. M. (1986) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/0005-1098(86)90039-7 · Cited by 3,677
Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems using analytical and knowledge-based redundancy
Frank, P. M. (1990) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/0005-1098(90)90018-d · Cited by 3,545
Linear System Theory and Design
Chen, C. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,047
A survey of design methods for failure detection in dynamic systems
Willsky, A. S. (1976) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/0005-1098(76)90041-8 · Cited by 2,153
A survey of design methods for failure detection in dynamic systems
(1977) · Microelectronics Reliability · doi:10.1016/0026-2714(77)90326-2 · Cited by 1,421
Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems : theory and applications
Patton, R. J., Frank, P. M., & Clarke, R. N. (1989) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 1,066
Self-citationDesign of observers for linear systems with unknown inputs
Hou, M., & Müller, P. C. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/9.256351 · Cited by 738
A geometric approach to the synthesis of failure detection filters
Massoumnia, M.-A. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1986.1104419 · Cited by 584
Failure accomodation in linear systems through self-reorganization.
Beard, R. V. (1971) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 498
Observers for linear systems with unknown inputs
Kudva, P., Viswanadham, N., & Ramakrishna, A. (1980) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1980.1102245 · Cited by 459
Cited by
Nahian, S. A., Dinh, T. Q., Dao, H. V., & Ahn, K. K. (2020) · IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · doi:10.1109/tmech.2020.3013609 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- CHEN, J., PATTON, R. J., & ZHANG, H.-Y.
- Venue
- International Journal of Control
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-105
- ISSN
- 0020-7179 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5820
- OpenAlex
- W2083514989
- Cited by
- 835
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 34.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design of unknown input observers and robust fault detection filters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00207179608921833
- The paper
- CHEN, J., PATTON, R. J., & ZHANG, H.-Y. (1996). Design of unknown input observers and robust fault detection filters. International Journal of Control. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179608921833
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.