The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Water Management In Textile Industry: Technical And Economic Aspects
Abstract
Textile industry is an intensive water use sector. Consequently, enormous quantities of wastewater are generated from different manufacturing processes. Numerous opportunities for water reuse could be exploited by rational management of water use and reuse via segregation and upgrading of specific effluents using membrane filtration systems comprising ultrafiltration (UF) and reverse osmosis (RO). This paper is an endeavor to develop technoeconomic indicators for extended water reuse applications in textile industry using UF and RO. Extensive data gathered from a typical Egyptian dye house have been utilized to rationalize water use and reuse management based on different levels of pollutants in waste streams. A developed rationale enabled the identification of four applicable intervention scenarios comprising three reuse scenarios ranging from limited reuse (about 25%) to maximum reuse (about 87%) and a total end of the pipe treatment scenario. The financial assessment for a typical wastewater load (about 3500 r m/day) reveals that the maximum reuse scenario comprising UF, two stage RO in addition to direct use and low press RO is the most preferred one. Further, sensitivity analysis indicates that the annual cost of the total end of pipe treatment scenario will equal the annual cost of the maximum reuse scenario when the unit cost are US$ 0.5, 0.43 and 0.3 per cubic meter for wastewater treatment, RO and UF respectively.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, available technoeconomical analyses indicate that inclusion of comprehensive energy and water reuse plan within the treatment scheme would be more viable as compared to full end-of-pipe treatment with limited or no recovery/reuse strategy.51”
From Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater (2007) · cites this paper as [51]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Reife A., 1996, Environmental Chemistry of Dyes and Pigments
- Fernand S., 1998, Textile Chem. Color, 30, 19
- Porter J.J., 1977, Textile Chem. Color, 9, 269
- Porter J.J., 1990, Chem. Color, 22, 21
- Gaddis J.L., 1989, Natl. Res. Counc. Can., Report NRCC 29895, 347
- Fuchs A., 1983, Text, Ind., 147, 44
- Scuderi F., 1982, AES, 4, 63
- Roxzelle W.N., 1994, Text, World, 144, 67
- Martin J.G., 1986, Pollution Prevention Pays Program
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1993)119:5(772) · DOI
- Adham S.S., 1969, Journal AWWA, 88, 22, 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1996.tb06551.x · DOI
- Bergman R.A., 1996, Journal AWWA, 88, 32, 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1996.tb06552.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater
Hai, F. I., Yamamoto, K., & Fukushi, K. (2007) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380601174723 · Cited by 557
Metadata
- Authors
- Defrawy, N. M. H. E.
- Venue
- International Journal of Environmental Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 573-587
- ISSN
- 0020-7233
- 1029-0400
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review