Cited by 45Mathematics Education and ProgramsMathematics Education and PedagogyHigher Education Research Studies

Predicting performance in a first engineering calculus course: Implications for interventions

Hieb, Jeffrey L., Lyle, Keith B., Ralston, Patricia A.S., Chariker, Julia·2015·International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology

Abstract

At the University of Louisville, a large, urban institution in the south-east United States, undergraduate engineering students take their mathematics courses from the school of engineering. In the fall of their freshman year, engineering students take Engineering Analysis I, a calculus-based engineering analysis course. After the first two weeks of the semester, many students end up leaving Engineering Analysis I and moving to a mathematics intervention course. In an effort to retain more students in Engineering Analysis I, the department collaborated with university academic support services to create a summer intervention programme. Students were targeted for the summer programme based on their score on an algebra readiness exam (ARE). In a previous study, the ARE scores were found to be a significant predictor of retention and performance in Engineering Analysis I. This study continues that work, analysing data from students who entered the engineering school in the fall of 2012. The predictive validity of the ARE was verified, and a hierarchical linear regression model was created using math American College Testing (ACT) scores, ARE scores, summer intervention participation, and several metacognitive and motivational factors as measured by subscales of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. In the regression model, ARE score explained an additional 5.1% of the variation in exam performance in Engineering Analysis I beyond math ACT score. Students took the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0020739x.2014.936976

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hieb, J. L., Lyle, K. B., Ralston, P. A. S., & Chariker, J.
Affiliations
University of Louisville (US)
Corresponding author
Hieb, Jeffrey L.
Venue
International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology
Published
2014-07-14
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
40-55
ISSN
  • 0020-739X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5211
OpenAlex
W2078715198
Cited by
45
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematics Education and Programs
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
Keywords
student retention, academic support, predictive validity, metacognition, learning strategies, motivation, goal orientation, test anxiety, exam performance prediction, Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review