Predicting performance in a first engineering calculus course: Implications for interventions
Abstract
At the University of Louisville, a large, urban institution in the south-east United States, undergraduate engineering students take their mathematics courses from the school of engineering. In the fall of their freshman year, engineering students take Engineering Analysis I, a calculus-based engineering analysis course. After the first two weeks of the semester, many students end up leaving Engineering Analysis I and moving to a mathematics intervention course. In an effort to retain more students in Engineering Analysis I, the department collaborated with university academic support services to create a summer intervention programme. Students were targeted for the summer programme based on their score on an algebra readiness exam (ARE). In a previous study, the ARE scores were found to be a significant predictor of retention and performance in Engineering Analysis I. This study continues that work, analysing data from students who entered the engineering school in the fall of 2012. The predictive validity of the ARE was verified, and a hierarchical linear regression model was created using math American College Testing (ACT) scores, ARE scores, summer intervention participation, and several metacognitive and motivational factors as measured by subscales of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. In the regression model, ARE score explained an additional 5.1% of the variation in exam performance in Engineering Analysis I beyond math ACT score. Students took the…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hieb et al. (2015) also considered metacognitive and motivational factors.
“Interestingly, Hieb et al. (2015) also considered metacognitive and motivational factors in their analysis.”
From Methodological Choices When Assessing Summer Bridge Programs in STEM Majors: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as Hieb et al. (2015)
Hieb et al. (2015) and Jura and Gerhardt (2022) used an internal validated instrument developed by department members to measure academic readiness.
“Furthermore, the studies by Hieb et al. (2015) and Jura and Gerhardt (2022) used an internal validated instrument developed by department members to measure academic readiness.”
From Methodological Choices When Assessing Summer Bridge Programs in STEM Majors: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as Hieb et al. (2015)
Cites
A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in College Students
Pintrich, P. R. (2004) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x · Cited by 3,269 · see citing works
Measuring Self-Regulated Learning
Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000) · Handbook of Self-Regulation · doi:10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50045-7 · Cited by 1,383 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Predicting academic performance: a systematic literature review
Hellas, A., Ihantola, P., Petersen, A., Ajanovski, V. V., Gutica, M., Hynninen, T., Knutas, A., Leinonen, J., Messom, C., & Liao, S. N. (2018) · Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education · doi:10.1145/3293881.3295783 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Mindfulness, anxiety, and high-stakes mathematics performance in the laboratory and classroom
Bellinger, D. B., DeCaro, M. S., & Ralston, P. A. S. (2015) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2015.09.001 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Self-citationHopkins, R. F., Lyle, K. B., Hieb, J. L., & Ralston, P. A. S. (2016) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9349-8 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Self-citationMethodological Choices When Assessing Summer Bridge Programs in STEM Majors: A Scoping Review
Caballero Díaz, D., Amin, A., Musa, P., & Leung, V. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16020220
- Authors
- Hieb, J. L., Lyle, K. B., Ralston, P. A. S., & Chariker, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Louisville (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hieb, Jeffrey L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-07-14
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-55
- ISSN
- 0020-739X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5211
- OpenAlex
- W2078715198
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematics Education and Programs
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Keywords
- student retention, academic support, predictive validity, metacognition, learning strategies, motivation, goal orientation, test anxiety, exam performance prediction, Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review