Cited by 12Mental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHistorical Psychiatry and Medical Practices

Recovery in Italy: an update

Basso, Luigi, Boggian, Ileana, Carozza, Paola, Lamonaca, Dario, Svettini, Alessandro·2016·International Journal of Mental Health

Abstract

:Since the 1990s, a general reflection has gradually evolved in Italy on the effects of the transformation of psychiatry from being mainly institutional to more community-oriented. Increasingly substantial epidemiological studies and processes of outcome evaluations have focused not only on the clinical aspects, but also on the social and functional level (quality of life, care needs, users’ satisfaction for the treatments received). With a certain delay compared to the Anglo-Saxon countries, in recent years, several elements of the concept of recovery have also increasingly emerged in Italy: hope, expectations, self-esteem, self-efficacy, awareness, personal autonomy, and dignity. The present article describes the most relevant experiences conducted in Italy in the latest years developing a recovery-oriented approach in psychiatry, in different areas: methodology, peer support, education, services transformation, and research. In particular, the Italian Study on Recovery (SIR) is described, a research conducted in the “real world” of service-users of Italian mental health services and their family members. Its quantitative part consists of the validation of the Italian translation of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) and its efficacy in identifying persons in recovery (after University of California–Los Angeles [UCLA] criteria). The qualitative research spotlights the experiences and values of services users in recovery and their families. Conclusions focus on the importance of reshaping psychiatric services based on the principles of recovery and on how this transformation should be guided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207411.2016.1159891

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 12

Authors
Basso, L., Boggian, I., Carozza, P., Lamonaca, D., & Svettini, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • University of Ferrara (IT)
Corresponding author
Lamonaca, Dario
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health
Published
2016-01-02
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
71-88
ISSN
  • 0020-7411 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9328
OpenAlex
W2347285319
Cited by
12
References
58
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Mental Health (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Keywords
recovery, Recovery Assessment Scale, service users, family members, peer support, community mental health, self-efficacy, individual autonomy, human dignity, quality of life, Italy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review