The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performance measures and metrics in logistics and supply chain management: a review of recent literature (1995–2004) for research and applications
Abstract
Performance measures and metrics are essential for effectively managing logistics operations, particularly in a competitive global economy. The global economy is featured with global operations, outsourcing and supply chain and e-commerce. The real challenge for managers of this new enterprise environment is to develop suitable performance measures and metrics to make right decisions that would contribute to an improved organizational competitiveness. Now the question is whether traditional performance measures can be used and out of them which ones should be given priority for measuring the performance in a new enterprise environment. Some of the traditional measures and metrics may not be suitable for the new environment wherein many activities are not easily identifiable. Measuring intangibles and nonfinancial performance measures pose the greater challenge in the so-called knowledge economy. Nevertheless, measuring them is so critical for the successful operations of companies in this environment. Considering the importance of nonfinancial measures and intangibles, an attempt has been made in this paper to determine the key performance measures and metrics in supply chain and logistics operations. This is based on a literature survey and some of the reported case experiences. Suggestions for future research directions are also indicated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda
Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443579510083622 · Cited by 3,259
Stevens, G. C. (1989) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Materials Management · doi:10.1108/eum0000000000329 · Cited by 1,560
Cited by
Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies
Oztemel, E., & Gursev, S. (2020) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8 · Cited by 2,143
Wang, G., Gunasekaran, A., Ngai, E. W. T., & Papadopoulos, T. (2016) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.03.014 · Cited by 1,545
Self-citationOrganisational resilience: development of a conceptual framework for organisational responses
Burnard, K., & Bhamra, R. (2011) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.563827 · Cited by 704
Masudin, I., Wastono, T., & Zulfikarijah, F. (2018) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2018.1485212 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Gunasekaran, A., & Kobu, B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Production Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-06-15
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2819-2840
- ISSN
- 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-588X
- OpenAlex
- W2137671455
- Cited by
- 785
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance measures and metrics in logistics and supply chain management: a review of recent literature (1995–2004) for research and applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00207540600806513
- The paper
- Gunasekaran, A., & Kobu, B. (2007). Performance measures and metrics in logistics and supply chain management: a review of recent literature (1995–2004) for research and applications. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540600806513
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.