The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Green supply chain practices and the selection of environmental technologies
Abstract
The pressure on manufacturing organizations to adopt benign processes and to develop greener products has increased significantly over the last decade. As such, several manufacturing organizations have turned to their suppliers and customers to find innovative solutions to environmental issues. Using the data from a survey of the Canadian and United States package printing industry, the linkage between green supply chain practices and the selection of environmental technologies is examined. This paper differs from other studies that have linked supply chain management to environmental technologies as it focuses specifically on green interactions between organizations in the supply chain. In particular, the paper explores the possible relation between environmental collaboration and environmental monitoring in the supply chain and the form of environmental investment characterized by three categories: pollution prevention, pollution control, and management systems. The results suggest that environmental collaboration with suppliers is positively associated with greater investment in pollution prevention technologies while such collaboration with customers has no impact on the adoption and the implementation of pollution prevention technologies. In contrast, environmental collaboration with suppliers is associated with fewer investments in management systems. Overall, green supply chain practices with customers have very little impact on environmental investment decisions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Green purchasing practices of US firms
Min, H., & Galle, W. P. (2001) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/eum0000000005923 · Cited by 745
Cited by
Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis
Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Davarzani, H. (2015) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003 · Cited by 2,131
An analysis of the drivers affecting the implementation of green supply chain management
Diabat, A., & Govindan, K. (2011) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.12.002 · Cited by 938
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K.-H. (2012) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.571937 · Cited by 614
Lee, K., & Kim, J. (2011) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.714 · Cited by 342
Sustainable manufacturing. Bibliometrics and content analysis
Bhatt, Y., Ghuman, K., & Dhir, A. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120988 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Vachon, S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Production Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-09-15
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 18-19
- Pages
- 4357-4379
- ISSN
- 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-588X
- OpenAlex
- W2137188664
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Green supply chain practices and the selection of environmental technologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00207540701440303
- The paper
- Vachon, S. (2007). Green supply chain practices and the selection of environmental technologies. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540701440303
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
