The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The evolution of production systems from Industry 2.0 through Industry 4.0
Abstract
This paper discusses production systems with a focus on the relationships between product supply and customer demand in the context of Industry 2.0–4.0. One driver of production evolution is changes in customer demand over time, which is categorised into several dimensions. Major production systems – flow line, Toyota production system (TPS), job shop, cell, flexible manufacturing system and seru – have been developed and applied to supplies to match different demand dimensions over time. For each production system, two questions are addressed: what and how. Comparisons between seru with TPS and cell are given. The possibilities of a future smart factory equipped with internet of things are discussed. The demand dimensions of Industry 4.0, the product architecture change in the automobile industry and the impact of 3D printing are elaborated. Potential applications of lean and seru principles for Industry 4.0 are presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A global sustainability perspective on 3D printing technologies
Gebler, M., Schoot Uiterkamp, A. J. M., & Visser, C. (2014) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.033 · Cited by 950
de Treville, S., & Antonakis, J. (2006) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.04.001 · Cited by 549
Cited by
Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies
Frank, A. G., Dalenogare, L. S., & Ayala, N. F. (2019) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.004 · Cited by 2,958
The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance
Dalenogare, L. S., Benitez, G. B., Ayala, N. F., & Frank, A. G. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.019 · Cited by 2,201
Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability
Ghobakhloo, M. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119869 · Cited by 2,115
Industry 4.0 innovation ecosystems: An evolutionary perspective on value cocreation
Benitez, G. B., Ayala, N. F., & Frank, A. G. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107735 · Cited by 508
Fragapane, G., Ivanov, D., Peron, M., Sgarbossa, F., & Strandhagen, J. O. (2022) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-020-03526-7 · Cited by 459
Metadata
- Authors
- Yin, Y., Stecke, K. E., & Li, D.
- Venue
- International Journal of Production Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-11-24
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 848-861
- ISSN
- 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-588X
- OpenAlex
- W2768739795
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 52.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The evolution of production systems from Industry 2.0 through Industry 4.0. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00207543.2017.1403664
- The paper
- Yin, Y., Stecke, K. E., & Li, D. (2018). The evolution of production systems from Industry 2.0 through Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1403664
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
