The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Supply Chain Viability and the COVID-19 pandemic: a conceptual and formal generalisation of four major adaptation strategies
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged supply chains (SC) on an unprecedented scale testing viability and adaptation under severe uncertainty. However, the literature on the adaptation strategies and quantification of their impacts is still scarce. Mixing literature analysis, case study approach, and quantitative techniques for performance assessment under disruptions, our study generalises four adaptations strategies – intertwining, scalability, substitution, and repurposing – to maintain SC viability when facing a pandemic, and offers a model to analyse and quantify deployment and impact of adaptation. First, we analyse the recent literature and identify some of the general characteristics of adaptation strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic. We then describe case studies to illustrate the practical context and supplement the literature analysis in order to derive relevant determinants for building of a conceptual framework and construction of a formal model. In the conceptual framework, we show how the adaptation strategies can be aligned with the SC viability, encompassing the levels of the ecosystem, network, and resources. In the generalised model, we formalise the impacts and efforts in deploying and assessing the adaptation strategies as both a process and an outcome. We close by proposing some open research questions and outline several future research directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2013) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj · Cited by 4,798
Guerras-Martin, L. A., & Ronda-Pupo, G. A. (2016) · The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management · doi:10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_565-1 · Cited by 3,057
Ivanov, D. (2020) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.101922 · Cited by 2,280
Self-citationInternational Journal of Production Research
HAWKINS, T. H. (1962) · Nature · doi:10.1038/1931144a0 · Cited by 2,111
Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1750727 · Cited by 2,100
Self-citationIvanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086 · Cited by 2,055
Self-citationIvanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2021) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2020.1768450 · Cited by 1,790
Self-citationOn the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks
Tomlin, B. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0515 · Cited by 1,700
Ivanov, D. (2022) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-020-03640-6 · Cited by 1,343
Self-citationReview of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis
Hosseini, S., Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2019) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2019.03.001 · Cited by 1,275
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ivanov, D.
- Venue
- International Journal of Production Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-03-09
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3535-3552
- ISSN
- 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-588X
- OpenAlex
- W3134061947
- Cited by
- 561
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 66.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supply Chain Viability and the COVID-19 pandemic: a conceptual and formal generalisation of four major adaptation strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00207543.2021.1890852
- The paper
- Ivanov, D. (2021). Supply Chain Viability and the COVID-19 pandemic: a conceptual and formal generalisation of four major adaptation strategies. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1890852
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.