CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 114Writing and Handwriting EducationNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismMental Health via Writing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Execution and pauses in writing narratives: Processing time, cognitive effort and typing skill

Alves, Rui Alexandre, Castro, São Luís, Olive, Thierry·2008·International Journal of Psychology
DOI 10.1080/00207590701398951
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

At the behavioural level, the activity of a writer can be described as periods of typing separated by pauses. Although some studies have been concerned with the functions of pauses, few have investigated motor execution periods. Precise estimates of the distribution of writing processes, and their cognitive demands, across periods of typing and pauses are lacking. Furthermore, it is uncertain how typing skill affects these aspects of writing. We addressed these issues, selecting writers of low and high typing skill who performed dictation and composition tasks. The occurrences of writing processes were assessed through directed verbalization, and their cognitive demands were measured through interference in reaction times (IRT). Before writing a narrative, 34 undergraduates learned to categorize examples of introspective thoughts as different types of activities related to writing (planning, translating, or revising). Then, while writing, they responded to random auditory probes, and reported their ongoing activity according to the learned categories. Convergent with previous findings, translating was most often reported, and revising and planning had fewer occurrences. Translating was mostly activated during motor execution, whereas revising and planning were mainly activated during pauses. However, none of the writing processes can be characterized as being typical of pauses, since translating was activated to a similar extent as the other two processes. Regarding cognitive demands, revising is likely to be the most demanding process in narrative writing. Typing skill had an impact on IRTs of motor execution. The demands of execution were greater in the low than in the high typing skill group, but these greater demands did not affect the strategy of writing processes activation. Nevertheless, low typing skill had a detrimental impact on text quality.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207590701398951

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Alves R. A., 2007, Writing and cognition: Research and applications
  2. Gentner D. R., 1988, The nature of expertise, 1
  3. Kellogg R. T., 1996, The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and application, 57
  4. Schilperoord J., 1996, Theories, models and methodology in writing research, 21
  5. Strömqvist S, 1999, The process of writing: A progress report
  6. Strömqvist S., 2002, ScriptLog for Windows: User's manual

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–114 of 114

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Alves, R. A., Castro, S. L., & Olive, T.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Alves, Rui Alexandre
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-11-21
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
969-979
ISSN
  • 0020-7594 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-066X
DOI
10.1080/00207590701398951
OpenAlex
W2058760204
Cited by
114
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
11.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
writing process, typing skills, narrative writing, cognitive effort, processing time, writing planning, textual revision, text translation, text quality, dictation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention, Computer Literacy, Female, Handwriting, Humans, Male, Motor Skills, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Students, Thinking, Translating, Writing, Narration, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review