Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 405

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Reinterpretation of Organic Liquid-Polytetrafluoroethylene Surface Interactions

Kaelble, D. H., Uy, K. C.·1970·The Journal of Adhesion

Abstract

The wettability of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) by organic liquids is reanalyzed in terms of dispersion-polar interactions across the liquid-solid interface. The analysis provides values of γs d = 19.6 dyne/cm, and γS D = 2.0 dyne/cm for the respective dispersion and polar parts of the surface tension γs = 21.6 for PTFE. The definition of a polar contribution to the surface tension of PTFE clarifies detailed aspects of the wettability of this polymer by different homologous liquid series. A modified analytical definition for work of adhesion is developed and applied to this discussion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0021846708544579

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 405

Metadata

Authors
Kaelble, D. H., & Uy, K. C.
Venue
The Journal of Adhesion
Published
1970-01-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
50-60
ISSN
  • 0021-8464 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-5823
OpenAlex
W2146045738
Cited by
405
References
0
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Reinterpretation of Organic Liquid-Polytetrafluoroethylene Surface Interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0021846708544579
The paper
Kaelble, D. H., & Uy, K. C. (1970). A Reinterpretation of Organic Liquid-Polytetrafluoroethylene Surface Interactions. The Journal of Adhesion. https://doi.org/10.1080/0021846708544579

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.