The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Peel Mechanics
Abstract
Published treatments of peel mechanics are shown to yield inconsistent relations for the dependence of peel force upon the angle of peel. The paradox is resolved by limiting the stress analyses to small bending deformations of the detaching strip in the still-attached region. This condition holds when the moment arm of the applied peel force is much larger than the length of the high-stress region in the bond, which must therefore be considered a prerequisite for use of the published bond stress distributions. Failure of some experimental results to conform to the theoretical dependence of peel force upon peel angle are ascribed to inelastic deformation or stretching of the detaching strip.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“At steady state (>2 s), the peel forces (F) with and without the microfluidics are approximately the same, consistent with a scaling relationship that depends only on G and the width of the device, W, as F = G × W(22).”
From Binodal, wireless epidermal electronic systems with in-sensor analytics for neonatal intensive care (2019) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
Cites
The science of adhesive joints
Jellinek, H. H. G. (1969) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/0021-9797(69)90392-0 · Cited by 263
Theory and Analysis of Peel Adhesion: Bond Stresses and Distributions
Kaelble, D. H. (1960) · Transactions of the Society of Rheology · doi:10.1122/1.548868 · Cited by 226
The Peeling Test on Redux‐bonded Joints
Spies, G. (1953) · Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology · doi:10.1108/eb032268 · Cited by 103
Peel adhesion. II. A theoretical analysis
Gardon, J. L. (1963) · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/app.1963.070070220 · Cited by 70
Jouwersma, C. (1960) · Journal of Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/pol.1960.1204514535 · Cited by 33
Biaxial Bond Stress Analysis in Peeling
Kaelble, D. H., & Ho, C. L. (1974) · Transactions of the Society of Rheology · doi:10.1122/1.549333 · Cited by 24
Inoue, Y., & Kobatake, Y. (1959) · Flow Turbulence and Combustion · doi:10.1007/bf00411757 · Cited by 24
Cleavage behavior of bonds made with adherends capable of plastic yield
Duke, A. J., & Stanbridge, R. P. (1968) · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/app.1968.070120701 · Cited by 9
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Rivlin R. S., 1944, Paint Technol., 9, 1
- Deryagin B. V., 1948, Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR, 61, 849
- Gent, A. N. and Schultz, J. Proc. Internatl. Rubber Conf. May1972, Brighton, England. pp.CI1–6. London: Institution Rubber Industry.
- Lindley P. B., 1971, J. Instn. Rubber Industr., 5, 243
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Binodal, wireless epidermal electronic systems with in-sensor analytics for neonatal intensive care
Chung, H. U., Kim, B. H., Lee, J. Y., Lee, J., Xie, Z., Ibler, E. M., Lee, K., Banks, A., Jeong, J. Y., Kim, J., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau0780 · Cited by 807
The peeling of flexible laminates
Kinloch, A. J., Lau, C. C., & Williams, J. G. (1994) · International Journal of Fracture · doi:10.1007/bf00012635 · Cited by 451
Elastoplastic analysis of the peel test
Kim, K., & Aravas, N. (1988) · International Journal of Solids and Structures · doi:10.1016/0020-7683(88)90071-6 · Cited by 296
Kinloch, A. J. (1982) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/bf00540361 · Cited by 263
Peel tests for quantifying adhesion and toughness: A review
Bartlett, M. D., Case, S. W., Kinloch, A. J., & Dillard, D. (2023) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101086 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Gent, A. N., & Hamed, G. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Akron (US)
- ORCID
- Hamed, G. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Adhesion
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1975-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 91-95
- ISSN
- 0021-8464 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-5823
- OpenAlex
- W4241006807
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Adhesion (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Mechanical Behavior of Composites
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Contact Mechanics and Variational Inequalities
- Keywords
- peel force, peel angle, bond stress distribution, adhesive joints, bending deformation, moment arm, inelastic deformation, adhesion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
