The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Plasma Treatment for Improved Bonding: A Review
Abstract
The nature of low-pressure glow-discharge plasma, plasma equipment, and the effect of plasma on materials is reviewed. Examples are given of the improved adhesive bonding of polymers after plasma treatment (2–10 times improvement in lap-shear) and of the surface cleaning and chemical modification that occurs during plasma treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review of methods for improving the interfacial adhesion between carbon fiber and polymer matrix
Tang, L., & Kardos, J. L. (1997) · Polymer Composites · doi:10.1002/pc.10265 · Cited by 309
Adhesion enhancement of polymer surfaces by atmospheric plasma treatment
Shenton, M. J., Lovell-Hoare, M. C., & Stevens, G. C. (2001) · Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics · doi:10.1088/0022-3727/34/18/307 · Cited by 273
Atmosphere-Mediated Superhydrophobicity of Rationally Designed Micro/Nanostructured Surfaces
Yan, X., Huang, Z., Sett, S., Oh, J., Cha, H., Li, L., Feng, L., Wu, Y., Zhao, C., Orejon, D., et al. (2019) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b09106 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Liston, E. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Adhesion
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1989-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1-4
- Pages
- 199-218
- ISSN
- 0021-8464 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-5823
- OpenAlex
- W1998056934
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plasma Treatment for Improved Bonding: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00218468908048206
- The paper
- Liston, E. M. (1989). Plasma Treatment for Improved Bonding: A Review. The Journal of Adhesion. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218468908048206
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
