Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 44Educational Theory and Curriculum StudiesGlobal Educational Policies and ReformsEducation Pedagogy and Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Exploring curriculum change using discursive institutionalism – a conceptual framework

Open access
Nordin, Andreas, Sundberg, Daniel·2018·Journal of Curriculum Studies

Abstract

The article aims to explore to what extent and in what ways discourse institutionalism can contribute to the understanding and analysis of curriculum change in a globalized context. By focusing specifically on curriculum change, this article proposes how discourse institutionalism can contribute to the so-called ‘crisis of curriculum theory’ by addressing (i) the non-linearity of change, (ii) the process of the translation of ideas and (iii) actor agency. The text is structured in three sections. In the first section, we elaborate on the notion of curriculum change as a vital concept for the field of curriculum theory in a globalized context, focusing on processes of recontextualization and the translation of curriculum content. In the second, we elaborate on discourse institutionalism as a contributing approach to the analysis of such processes of curriculum change, constructing a conceptual framework. In the third and final section, we give some examples of how the conceptual framework can be used in analysing curriculum change, using the 2011 Swedish curriculum reform (Lgr 11) as an empirical reference, and the result shows that the conceptual framework offers a wide repertoire of possible approaches to analysing curriculum change, both vertically and horizontally.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00220272.2018.1482961

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 10.4135/9781412976572.n17 · DOI
  2. Apple M., 1982, Education and Power
  3. Autio T., 2014, International handbook of curriculum research, 17
  4. Bernstein B., 2000, Pedagogy, symbolic control & identity: theory, research, critique, 10.5771/9781461636205 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1080/00220272.2013.798838 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/00220272.2015.1090628 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/14681366.2015.1083465 · DOI
  8. Durkheim É., 1912, The elementary forms of religious life
  9. 10.1080/14681366.2011.582256 · DOI
  10. Giddens A., 1984, The constitution of society
  11. Hopmann S., 2000, Teaching as a reflective practice. The German Didaktik tradition, 3
  12. 10.1080/00220270801989818 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1989.tb00277.x · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01418.x · DOI
  15. Kelly K, 2010, Technology is a living force that can expand our individual potential - if we listen to what it wants
  16. Kingdon J. W, 1984, Agendas, alternatives and public policies
  17. Landahl J., 2017, Bortom PISA. Internationell och jämförande pedagogic |Beyond PISA. International and comparative education], 9
  18. 10.1080/03050060903184940 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/00220272.2015.1095354 · DOI
  20. Meyer H.-D., 2006, The new institutionalism in education, 10.1353/book5121 · DOI
  21. Meyer J. W., 2012, Discourse formation in comparative education, 111
  22. NAE (Swedish National Agency for Education), 2011, Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the leisure-time centre. Lgr 11
  23. 10.15730/books.90 · DOI
  24. 10.15730/books.90 · DOI
  25. 10.1177/1474904116641697 · DOI
  26. Official report, 1992, Skola för bildning [School for bildung]
  27. Official report, 2007, Tydliga mål och kunskapskrav i grundskolan. Förslag till nytt mål- och uppföljningssystem [Clear goals and knowledge requirements in compulsory school education. Proposal for a new system of goals and monitoring]
  28. Pinar W., 1995, Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. New York, NY: Peter Lang
  29. Pinar W. F., 2008, The SAGE handbook of curriculum and instruction, 369
  30. Popkewitz T. S., 1991, A political sociology of educational reform: Power/knowledge in teaching, teacher education and research
  31. 10.1080/14681366.2011.582258 · DOI
  32. Rhodes R. A. W., 2006, The Oxford handbook on public policy
  33. Sahlin-Andersson, K. (1996). Imitating by editing success: The construction of organizational fields. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.),Translating organizational change(pp. 69–92). Berlin: DeGruyter.
  34. 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342 · DOI
  35. 10.1017/S175577390999021X · DOI
  36. 10.1080/19460171.2011.576520 · DOI
  37. 10.1177/1369148115612792 · DOI
  38. Schriewer J., 2012, Discourse formation in comparative education
  39. 10.1086/442881 · DOI
  40. Simola H., 2013, Journal of Education Policy, 28, 465, 10.1080/02680939.2013.770554 · DOI
  41. 10.1177/1474904116647060 · DOI
  42. Steiner-Khamsi G, 2012, Policy borrowing and lending in education, 3
  43. Steiner-Khamsi G., 2012, Policy borrowing and lending in education
  44. 10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.342 · DOI
  45. Torres C. A., 2003, The international handbook of the sociology of education – An international assessment of new research and theory
  46. Uljens M., 2016, Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação, 9, 121, 10.20952/revtee.2016vl9iss17pp121-132 · DOI
  47. 10.3402/nstep.v1.30177 · DOI
  48. 10.1080/02680939.2017.1344879 · DOI
  49. 10.1111/j.1467-873X.2005.00317.x · DOI
  50. Whellahan L., 2010, Why knowledge matters in the curriculum: A social realist argument
  51. 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01422.x · DOI
  52. 10.1080/00220272.2014.921840 · DOI
  53. Young M., 1971, Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education
  54. Young M., 2008, Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education
  55. 10.1080/00220272.2013.764505 · DOI
  56. 10.1080/00220272.2015.1101493 · DOI

Cited by

See all 44

Metadata

Authors
Nordin, A., & Sundberg, D.
Affiliations
Linnaeus University (SE)
Corresponding author
Nordin, Andreas
Venue
Journal of Curriculum Studies
Published
2018-06-19
Volume
50
Issue
6
Pages
820-835
ISSN
  • 0022-0272 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5839
OpenAlex
W2809402311
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Curriculum Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DiVA (Linnaeus University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
Keywords
curriculum change, discursive institutionalism, globalization, translation of concepts, actor agency, recontextualization, curriculum content, Lgr 11, conceptual framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring curriculum change using discursive institutionalism – a conceptual framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00220272.2018.1482961
The paper
Nordin, A., & Sundberg, D. (2018). Exploring curriculum change using discursive institutionalism – a conceptual framework. Journal of Curriculum Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1482961