The DOI matches its Crossref record.
World Poverty and the Role of Agricultural Technology: Direct and Indirect Effects
Abstract
Agricultural technology can help reduce poverty through direct and indirect effects. Direct effects are gains for the adopters while indirect effects are gains derived from adoption by others leading to lower food prices, employment creation, and growth linkage effects. Conceptualising and measuring these effects is highly complex, yet is needed for each region if technology is to be used as an effective instrument for poverty reduction. We propose a methodology for doing this in the context of computable general equilibrium modelling and apply it to archetype models for Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Results show that the dominant effect of technology on poverty is through direct effects in Africa, indirect agricultural employment effects in Asia, and linkage effects through the rest of the economy in Latin America. In each case, increasing the poverty reduction effect through the targeting of technology across crops and through complementary rural development programmes is also explored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Genetically modified crops and food security
Qaim, M., & Kouser, S. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064879 · Cited by 222
Metadata
- Authors
- de Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Development Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1-26
- ISSN
- 0022-0388 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9140
- OpenAlex
- W2085082611
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 43.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: World Poverty and the Role of Agricultural Technology: Direct and Indirect Effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00220380412331322401
- The paper
- de Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2002). World Poverty and the Role of Agricultural Technology: Direct and Indirect Effects. Journal of Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380412331322401
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.