The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sen's capability approach and the many spaces of human well-being
Abstract
Following Amartya Sen, this paper contends that the capability approach provides a better framework for thinking about human well-being and development than more traditional approaches which typically focus on utility or resources. This is illustrated by drawing on the results of a survey which investigated how ordinary people in South Africa view human well-being (a ‘good’ form of life). However, the results of this exercise indicate that the capability approach overlaps with both utility (happiness, pleasure, etc) and resource-based concepts of well-being. The distinctions between commodities (and their characteristics), human functioning and utility is less robust than Sen implies. In particular, the capability approach needs to make more space for the role of utility (defined broadly to include all valuable mental states) and say more about the material basis of well-being.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sen, A. (2009) · Rugman Reviews · doi:10.1007/978-1-137-28787-8_94 · Cited by 15,837
Clapp, J., & Sen, A. (1999) · International Journal · doi:10.2307/40203469 · Cited by 13,411
Church, J. A. (2001) · Journal of Government Information · doi:10.1016/s1352-0237(01)00307-0 · Cited by 9,153
A New Approach to Consumer Theory
Lancaster, K. J. (1966) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/259131 · Cited by 8,471
A New Approach to Consumer Theory
Lancaster, K. J. (1976) · Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-51565-1_34 · Cited by 6,913
Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511841286 · Cited by 6,103
Sugden, R., & Sen, A. (1986) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232999 · Cited by 4,031
Usher, D., & Sen, A. (1987) · The Canadian Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/135247 · Cited by 3,731
Broome, J., & Sen, A. (1993) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234727 · Cited by 3,217
Sen, A. (1993) · The Quality of Life · doi:10.1093/0198287976.003.0003 · Cited by 3,128
Cited by
Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement
Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.006 · Cited by 684
Information and Communication Technology and the Social Inclusion of Refugees1
Andrade, A. D., & Doolin, B. (2016) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2016/40.2.06 · Cited by 309
Envisioning Communities: A Participatory Approach Towards AI for Social Good
Bondi, E., Xu, L., Acosta-Navas, D., & Killian, J. A. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462612 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark, D. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Development Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1339-1368
- ISSN
- 0022-0388 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9140
- OpenAlex
- W2014568439
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 18.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sen's capability approach and the many spaces of human well-being. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00220380500186853
- The paper
- Clark, D. A. (2005). Sen's capability approach and the many spaces of human well-being. Journal of Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380500186853
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
