The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Benefits of Opportunity to Read and Balanced Instruction on the NAEP
Abstract
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) requires reading comprehension processes that may be increased by students' amount of engaged reading, parental education, and gender, along with balanced reading instruction and opportunity to read. To examine the effects of those variables on reading achievement and engagement, the authors analyzed the 1994 Grade 4 Maryland NAEP with hierarchical linear modeling to construct both between-school and between-teacher models. Amount of engaged reading significantly predicted reading achievement on the NAEP, after parental education was statistically controlled. Balanced reading instruction significantly predicted reading achievement after accounting for students' engaged reading and parental education. Findings confirmed expectations from the proposed theoretical perspective on reading engagement. Policy implications included an emphasis on some instructional variables in the reading engagement model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation
Schunk, D. H. (1991) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133 · Cited by 4,292
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571 · Cited by 3,428
Cited by
Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307310317 · Cited by 1,259
Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., & Hibel, J. (2008) · Learning Disability Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25474651 · Cited by 100
Comprehension-based silent reading rates: what do we know? What do we need to know?
Hiebert, E. H., Samuels, S. J., & Rasinski, T. (2012) · Literacy Research and Instruction · doi:10.1080/19388071.2010.531887 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Guthrie, J. T., Schafer, W. D., & Huang, C.-W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Educational Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 145-162
- ISSN
- 0022-0671 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-0675
- OpenAlex
- W1979453577
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benefits of Opportunity to Read and Balanced Instruction on the NAEP. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00220670109599912
- The paper
- Guthrie, J. T., Schafer, W. D., & Huang, C.-W. (2001). Benefits of Opportunity to Read and Balanced Instruction on the NAEP. The Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670109599912
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.