The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Extroversion as a Factor Conditioning AchieveMent in the Fifth and Sixth Grades of the Elementary School
Abstract
Several studies have indicated that the introvert succeeds better academically in high school and college than does the extrovert.1 Exag geration of the thought processes at the expense of overt social behavior, which is the major characteristic of the typical introvert, according to Freyd,2 seems rather naturally to go with relatively high success in the pursuit of book knowledge. However, the theoretical literature on in troversion-extroversion does not favor the introvert above the extrovert from the standpoint of generally desirable personality, and in fact is inclined to give preference to the extrovert or to the so-called ambivert. The major problem of the present investigation is to determine whether the relationship between introversion-extroversion and school success, as found for secondary and higher education, holds for fifthand sixth grade elementary school children. Minor problems are to determine a satisfactory method of measuring extroversion (this term will be used hereafter in place of the double term, introversion-extroversion) for in termediate grade pupils; to study sex differences in extroversion, at this school level ; to determine in detail the relationships, for fifthand sixth-grade pupils, between age, intelligence, extroversion, and achieve ment; and to study sex differences in the relationships between these factors.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several researchers found nonsignificant relationships (e.g., Finch & Nemzek, 1932; Gilliland & Voas, 1930; Guthrie, 1927; Hanna, 1932; Hoitsma, 1925; McGeoch & Whitely, 1933; Powers, 1931), and others a slight superiority in introverts (e.g., Guilford, 1934; Hendrickson & Huskey, 1932; Oliver, 1930; Pechstein, 1928; Stanger, 1932, 1933); correlation coefficients never exceeded a 0.2 magnitude.”
From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Hendrickson & Huskey, 1932
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation
Wolf, M. B., & Ackerman, P. L. (2005) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.020 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Hendrickson, G., & Huskey, J. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Cincinnati (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Educational Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1932-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6-13
- ISSN
- 0022-0671 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-0675
- OpenAlex
- W2086265318
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
- Keywords
- extraversion, introversion, academic performance, elementary school students, fifth and sixth grade, sex differences, intelligence, age differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review