Cited by 138Teacher Professional Development and MotivationSchool Choice and PerformanceTeacher Education and Assessments

Teacher Retention: A Further Examination

Chapman, David W., Green, Michael S.·1986·The Journal of Educational Research

Abstract

This study tested Chapman's model of the influences on teacher retention in teaching. Discriminant analysis was used to test the significance of differences among four groups of college graduates with teaching certificates: (a) taught continuously, (b) intermittent teachers, (c) left teaching, and (d) never taught. Significant differences were found among the groups in a pattern that supported the model. The four groups responded to different incentives in formulating their career choices. Implications for teacher education, school administration, and public policy concerned with the quality of schooling are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00220671.1986.10885691

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Teacher turnover is strongly correlated with the individual characteristics of teachers.

    “This research shows that teacher turnover is strongly correlated with the individual characteristics of teachers.”

    From Teacher Turnover and Teacher Shortages: An Organizational Analysis (2001) · cites this paper as Chapman & Green, 1986

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 138

Authors
Chapman, D. W., & Green, M. S.
Affiliations
State University of New York (US)
Venue
The Journal of Educational Research
Published
1986-05
Volume
79
Issue
5
Pages
273-279
ISSN
  • 0022-0671 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-0675
OpenAlex
W2093455088
Cited by
138
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
10.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
Keywords
teacher retention, career choice, teacher professional development, school management, public policy, educational quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review